Space Cover 844: STS-51D Madrid printed and rubber stamp cachet coversFrom 1981 to 1992 there are Madrid tracking STS covers for each space shuttle launch.
Usually, for each shuttle launch, you can find Madrid printed covers and rubber stamp cachet (RSC) covers with identical cachet because, identical image was used in the printed covers and to do the die to apply to blank covers.
Printed covers were requested by German dealer Eberhard Coelle, in quantity around 200 to 300 exemplars, and RSC covers were delivered depending on the number of requests. In both cases, there are not official data neither not catalogs or lists about all Madrid tracking shuttle covers produced.
Meanwhile printed covers are always equal (all printed covers were delivered at same time to post office and received the same postmark), RSC covers are different because they were result of answering to different requests sent by particulars or collectors along several days/weeks, who previously sent their requests to US Embassy in Madrid, or NASA-INTA headquarters in Madrid, or directly to Madrid tracking stations located in the village of Fresnedillas de la Oliva (until 1985, when it closed) or in Robledo de Chavela, still operative.
However, in a few cases, printed and RSC are not identical but similar.
Maybe, the best example are the covers for the STS-51D mission.
Above the cover, printed version, monochrome, cheaper than multicolor, in red color was postmarked Madrid Apr 12, 1985 day of launch of Discovery shuttle. Postal rate is not the correct Spanish rate, just a stamp available at the moment; and registered postmark is used without registered mail, so no registered number. It was just a clear postmark to show to collectors.
Below the cover, RSC version (all RSC are always monochrome, just changing the color applied) is slightly different, in blue color but without any text (no crew names, no Discovery word, no STS-51D mention).

It is something strange because, as said, most usual is Madrid shuttle tracking printed and RSC covers with identical cachet. I do not know why happened it. Any thoughts?
Thanks in advance for sharing here your comments.