collectSPACE: Messages - Edit this post

Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

Forum: Satellites - Robotic Probes
Topic: [Discuss] Intuitive Machines' IM-1 moon mission

Only forum leaders (Administrator, Editor) or the person that posted this message may edit this message (and only registered users may edit/delete posts) Note: Only forum leaders may delete posts.
Delete? To delete this post, check this box.
Your UserName:
Your Password:	Forget your password?
Message to Edit: HTML is ON UBB Code is ON Smilies Legend	Originally posted by Robert Pearlman on 02-23-2024 05:52 PM It is not so much a matter of technology alone, but a matter of cost. China was able to share live video because it had use of an Earth-relay satellite (a spacecraft from a previous mission), adding millions of more dollars to their overall cost. Someday there may be U.S. relay satellites to allow for the same capability, but in the meantime, Intuitive Machines landed on the moon with a vehicle that cost (by one estimate) one-fifth of what China spent on its lander. Intuitive Machines' responsibility is to its customers, including NASA, and to its shareholders. The company did not have a need or requirement to know immediately what happened to its lander. The public may want live video for entertainment purposes (and I count myself among that number), but there is and was no technical justification for it, since even if they could see what was happening, there was nothing they could do about it. Besides, even if they had live video, there would still be people complaining about the quality or the orientation or the number of different angles available. People will always find a reason to complain. In any case, here's a new pretty picture to entertain the masses: <BLOCKQUOTE>[i]On Feb. 22, 2024, Intuitive Machines’ Odysseus lunar lander captures a wide field of view image of Schomberger crater on the Moon approximately 125 miles (200 km) uprange from the intended landing site, at approximately about 6 miles (10 km) altitude.[/i]</BLOCKQUOTE> <center><a href="http://www.collectspace.com/review/intuitive_machines_im1_lunar_orbit02-lg.jpg" target="AirLock"><img src="http://www.collectspace.com/review/intuitive_machines_im1_lunar_orbit02.jpg" width="400" height="300" border="0"></a></center>
	Disable Smilies in This Post.
*If HTML and/or UBB Code are enabled, this means you can use HTML and/or UBB Code in your message.

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts