Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Space History Photo of the Week
  Photo of the week 266 (December 5, 2009)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Photo of the week 266 (December 5, 2009)
heng44
Member

Posts: 3387
From: Netherlands
Registered: Nov 2001

posted 12-05-2009 04:04 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for heng44   Click Here to Email heng44     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Forty years ago, the Apollo 12 mission had been successfully completed and the next crew in line posed for their official crew portrait. Here is an ‘outtake’, showing Jim Lovell, Ken Mattingly and Fred Haise in a serious mood. Launch for Apollo 13 was scheduled for March 1970.

Ed Hengeveld

ASCAN1984
Member

Posts: 1049
From: County Down, Nothern Ireland
Registered: Feb 2002

posted 12-06-2009 10:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ASCAN1984   Click Here to Email ASCAN1984     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Part of me wonders if Ken did fly 13, would the outcome been any different.

robsouth
Member

Posts: 769
From: West Midlands, UK
Registered: Jun 2005

posted 12-06-2009 11:20 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for robsouth     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yeah of course it would have been different, it would have been Ken Mattingly saying, "Hey we've got a problem here", and not Jack Swigert!

MCroft04
Member

Posts: 1634
From: Smithfield, Me, USA
Registered: Mar 2005

posted 12-06-2009 01:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for MCroft04   Click Here to Email MCroft04     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I've often wondered if having Ken on the ground was an advantage, having trained for the mission.

randy
Member

Posts: 2176
From: West Jordan, Utah USA
Registered: Dec 1999

posted 12-06-2009 05:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for randy   Click Here to Email randy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think having Ken on the ground was a definite advantage, what with his knowledge and training.


Randy

music_space
Member

Posts: 1179
From: Canada
Registered: Jul 2001

posted 12-11-2009 09:09 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for music_space   Click Here to Email music_space     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I wonder if the sextant and the astrolabe are genuine artefacts or repros?

RichieB16
Member

Posts: 552
From: Oregon
Registered: Feb 2003

posted 12-11-2009 07:23 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for RichieB16   Click Here to Email RichieB16     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I don't know how big of an advantage it was to have Mattingly on the ground. It is true he was well trained and knowledgeable about the CSM... but so were a lot of other astronauts. It might have also been good to have him on board. Look at it from another perspective. On Apollo 13, the LEM was a critical piece of hardware that got the crew through the mission. Being able to stretch the LEM as far is it could go was critical. Haise was well known to be among the most knowledgeable with the LEM of the astronaut corps. Would they have benefited from having him on the ground problem solving rather than being on the mission? I don't think it mattered much.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement