Author
|
Topic: [RR Auction] Space & Aviation Sale (April 2017)
|
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 42988 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 03-17-2017 05:35 PM
collectSPACE Apollo astronaut's US flag secretly carried on the moon heads to auctionWhen Apollo 15 astronaut David Scott became the seventh person to walk on the moon in 1971, he wore a spacesuit adorned with American flags on both his left shoulder and atop his life support backpack. But as an upcoming auction has now surprisingly revealed, those were not the only two U.S. flags he had on him. Unbeknownst to even Scott until after he returned to Earth, hidden behind the stars and stripes decorating his Portable Life Support System's Oxygen Purge System (OPS) was a pouch holding smaller U.S. flags in a secret stash. |
Mike Dixon Member Posts: 1397 From: Kew, Victoria, Australia Registered: May 2003
|
posted 03-17-2017 07:32 PM
Oh, the things that come to light way after the event. Now wondering if other missions (following) had similar pouches. |
freshspot unregistered
|
posted 03-18-2017 03:53 AM
I enjoyed looking through this amazing auction. Some fantastic artifacts indeed! Well done as always RR Auction.But man oh man that #8216 - Apollo 11 Flown Command Module Columbia Rescue Arrow from Crew Hatch is incredible. Does anybody expect a battle over ownership for the arrow and #8217 - Apollo 11 Flown Command Module Columbia ID Plate? It seems odd that a random engineer would have been officially gifted those items. |
rgarner Member Posts: 1193 From: Shepperton, United Kingdom Registered: Mar 2012
|
posted 03-18-2017 04:11 AM
Personally I can see a bidding war erupt over a good number of pieces in this auction. It is one of the best auctions I have seen in many years if you ask me! |
Chuckster01 Member Posts: 873 From: Orlando, FL Registered: Jan 2014
|
posted 03-18-2017 04:52 AM
Hoping my lottery ticket pays off so I can participate. |
SpaceAholic Member Posts: 4437 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 03-18-2017 05:44 AM
quote: Originally posted by freshspot: It seems odd that a random engineer would have been officially gifted those items.
Certainly no random engineer - as explained in this associated thread. |
freshspot unregistered
|
posted 03-18-2017 05:50 AM
Thank you for clarifying Scott. I must have missed that earlier thread. |
music_space Member Posts: 1179 From: Canada Registered: Jul 2001
|
posted 03-18-2017 01:46 PM
I've got a horse in this race: lot 8029. |
AlanC Member Posts: 147 From: Scotland Registered: Nov 2014
|
posted 03-18-2017 08:00 PM
Who authorised the secretion of the pouch and why wasn't the CDR informed? |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 42988 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 03-18-2017 11:04 PM
I think the point was it wasn't authorized. It was secreted into the OPS assembly without anyone's knowledge, with a plan to retrieve it post-flight without anyone being the wiser. But whoever it was who hid it didn't get to the OPS first post-flight, the stash was found and NASA decided to confiscate the flags (giving some to Scott, along with the OPS bracket). |
AlanC Member Posts: 147 From: Scotland Registered: Nov 2014
|
posted 03-19-2017 12:55 PM
Interesting; I wonder who it was? Thanks Robert! |
Chuckster01 Member Posts: 873 From: Orlando, FL Registered: Jan 2014
|
posted 03-19-2017 04:47 PM
I wonder if the flags were given only to Scott or to the other crew members, Worden and Irwin also. |
Larry McGlynn Member Posts: 1255 From: Boston, MA Registered: Jul 2003
|
posted 03-21-2017 12:23 PM
In late 1971, senior management was advised of the stowaway flags. They contacted the Apollo 15 CDR and questioned his involvement in the matter. The whole affair was due to one man's idea of stashing a sealed Beta cloth bag of tiny US flags. Dave Scott didn't know anything about the flags. Management did ask if they should fire the employee. Dave said that the man had suffered enough and management didn't fire the man. Management kept several of the flags, gave the rest to Dave. The crew did give the flags to various NASA people and friends as gifts later on. It is a really interesting story. Based on items found in the Liberty Bell 7 Mercury capsule, this was a tried and true strategy for getting something flown on a flight. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 42988 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 03-21-2017 12:39 PM
Reportedly, these hidden caches continued throughout the space shuttle program with engineers and technicians stashing small pouches in the aft compartment of the orbiter (behind the engines, completely inaccessible to anyone during flight). |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 42988 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 03-28-2017 07:56 AM
Another stowaway to the moon included in the upcoming auction has drawn the attention of The Times of London: For an astronaut on a mission to the moon, one of the upsides of almost complete isolation might be an escape from workplace pranks.However, a soft-porn magazine centrefold and some strategically placed cartoon stickers up for auction next month reveal that even in space, an office prankster can hear you scream. |
gliderpilotuk Member Posts: 3398 From: London, UK Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 04-04-2017 11:01 AM
Somewhat surprised to see an item I had previously had refused for consignment now being listed on the auction with no more provenance than I could originally offer. |
Robert Pearlman Editor Posts: 42988 From: Houston, TX Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 04-04-2017 11:09 AM
I don't know how long ago it was you tried to consign, but considerations may have changed in the interim. So you might reach out to RR Auction and inquire if their interest has changed. |
gliderpilotuk Member Posts: 3398 From: London, UK Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 04-04-2017 12:05 PM
I will query the listing with RR before identifying. Provenance was the issue last time. But now, apparently, it is not. Sorry to be circumspect but I should raise directly with Bob. |
BLivingston Member Posts: 60 From: Boston,Ma. USA Registered: Jan 2010
|
posted 04-13-2017 11:30 AM
Bidding has begun and the space auction is now live. The 30 minute rule begins at 7:00 p.m. EDT on April 20. Kindly let me know if you have any questions or concerns. |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 04-13-2017 03:16 PM
There's a fleeting moment in the first few hours of the auction where I am the potential owner of a quite amazing set of space memorabilia. Unfortunately, the "RR Auction outbid notification" e-mails have been coming in thick and fast and my dreams are evaporating. Anyway, great stuff in this auction. Looks like the bidding will be strong. |
holcombeyates Member Posts: 243 From: UK Registered: Dec 2010
|
posted 04-15-2017 12:35 PM
Some great pieces again from RR, good work.Some strong bidding on flown hardware. I wonder if we will see some new highs. The Apollo 15 Cue Card is a really nice piece. Any one knows how many of these have come to auction? |
rjurek349 Member Posts: 1190 From: Northwest Indiana Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 04-16-2017 05:15 PM
The Apollo 17 deep space EVA cue card from Cernan is also very cool. I don't know how many on the Apollo 15 surface EVA cue cards, but for the Apollo 17, there were just three deep space lunar orbit EVAs (Apollo 15, Apollo 16, and Apollo 17), so this would be one of just three missions. And, of course, the last EVA of the Apollo lunar program. This auction has everything... a great mix of items, as usual. |
holcombeyates Member Posts: 243 From: UK Registered: Dec 2010
|
posted 04-18-2017 05:26 AM
For the later missions (15 to 17) I know that a standalone reversible cue card was used for each EVA. I haven't seen any standalone cue cards from missions prior to Apollo 15. Was a standalone version used for Apollo 11? What a great item to have! Or does anyone know any more? |
music_space Member Posts: 1179 From: Canada Registered: Jul 2001
|
posted 04-20-2017 10:41 AM
The home stretch... it's exciting!I've bought a lot since 1999... Now it's the first time I sell! #8029 - Soviet Voskhod Globus IMP Version 3 Navigation Instrument |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 04-21-2017 01:35 PM
I love RR's space auctions and particularly like the bidding system. However now that I'm checking the final results (as opposed to the final bids) I'm seeing plenty of unsold items thanks to hidden reserves.I'm really not a fan of these hidden reserves and believe they do a disservice to bidders and consigners alike. Bidders generally have a finite amount of funds to play with and if they know that an item they like is out of their price range they will often be tempted to spend that money on something else instead, boosting the prices realized for consignors overall and allowing the buyer to acquire items they might otherwise have had to let go. Alternatively they may be willing to stretch to the reserve if they know it in advance whilst in an open auction they might not reach that level whilst bidding against other collectors, all the while thinking they've won it. An extreme example in this auction would be the Apollo 11 CM ID plate which apparently failed to meet a hidden reserve despite a high bid of $46,089. At the end of the auction the high bidder on this item presumably thought they were going to be getting an invoice this morning for $56,000 (with fees) and will have been surprised to find they didn't win it. If they had known last night that the hidden reserve was, say, $50k they could have made the decision from the start to go all-out and reach this reserve, or they could have taken that money and spent it on a whole array of other big-ticket items in the auction. Instead those funds have gone unspent. As another example, in the Apollo 15 section there was a whole raft of flown items from Scott that went unsold despite what looked to me like pretty strong final bids - e.g. lots 8334-8339, where over $60,000 of collectors' funds went unspent on just these six items. This seems to hurt RR (through lost fees), the consignors (through lost sales and lower bids) and the bidders (through missed chances to win great items). So, another great auction with some great items but I do wish RR would re-consider this aspect of their sales. |
SpaceAholic Member Posts: 4437 From: Sierra Vista, Arizona Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 04-21-2017 03:45 PM
An item can be sold for less than the reserve. There is just no obligation to sell. The high bid below the reserve is the same as an offer that is less than the asking price on, for example, a classified ad. Auction houses (in coordination with the consigner) can and do periodically reengage post event to negotiate alternative lower sale prices.There is also an element of auction psychology that can cut both ways as unmasking of the reserve may dissuade some potential bidders from competing and depress perception about an items desirability. |
Chuckster01 Member Posts: 873 From: Orlando, FL Registered: Jan 2014
|
posted 04-21-2017 04:50 PM
I also believe posting a reserve price in the auction listing on many big ticket items would discourage many bidders from even placing a single bid. Many times, a bidder will get caught up in the auction and the reserve is never an issue but I would not want to sell a truly rare item way under a fair market value as that is a disservice to the consignor. I would bet a quick call to RR might work a negotiated settlement between the seller and the high bidder. Hey it never hurts to ask if you really want an item and you may have been very close to that reserve? The American Space Museum auctions also have hidden reserves on some items but we try and make them reasonable reserves to protect the seller as one bidder makes for a crappy auction. |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 04-21-2017 05:21 PM
Scott, you raise an interesting point that the reserve can be flexible during the auction which would preclude having a visible reserve price, but that still leaves the possibility of keeping the amount hidden whilst letting the high bidder know if they have reached the reserve or not.If the consignor chose to lower the reserve during the sale and this took it below the current high bid the high bidder could be informed by the auction house that their existing bid was now above the reserve. Maybe this is more a question for the big-rollers in the collecting game but I'm pretty sure if I'd come out of this auction the "winner" of the CM ID plate and those six Apollo 15 flown items for $100k then found out the next day that I'd actually won none of them and missed the chance to buy other great items with those funds I would not be happy. |
SkyMan1958 Member Posts: 867 From: CA. Registered: Jan 2011
|
posted 04-21-2017 10:50 PM
I would like to know what the reserves are, as reserves are a common practice in many auction houses, and those auction houses still seem to sell their items just fine. With regards to the CM ID plate, I STRONGLY suspect that the final "bid" on the plate was actually "The House" bidding to get up to the reserve, so the last "Real" bid would have been the one previous to that... say ~ $42,000.
|
freshspot unregistered
|
posted 04-22-2017 05:30 AM
When there is a reserve and the item hits the 7:00 pm 30 minute rule, the auction software will say that you are not the high bidder if the reserve has not been met. What this means is that the bidder who is at, say $8k on a $10k item will get an outbid notice and every time they submit a new bid until they reach the reserve, they get an outbid notice as if they are battling another bidder. You'd never be left hanging thinking you were going to win that item with a high bid that was lower than the reserve when the auction was in it's concluding minutes. As somebody who is both a buyer and a seller at the various auctions, this system really does work best. |
GACspaceguy Member Posts: 2476 From: Guyton, GA Registered: Jan 2006
|
posted 04-22-2017 05:40 AM
Never being one who has had to bid against the reserve, thanks for that information. That makes sense and fells like a good process as well. I really like this form of auction. |
spaced out Member Posts: 3110 From: Paris, France Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 04-23-2017 03:24 AM
David - Thanks for the extra information. It does still mean that as high bidder you have no way of knowing that a reserve exists until the end of the regular auction.The notification you mention at the end of regular bidding does give the high bidder a chance to up their bids to try to reach the reserve, which is good, but doesn't fully resolve the issue that they could have bid on other items with their funds. At this point they can still place bids on other items they'd previously bid on but it would be too late to try to bid on something they'd not already bid on. So, I still don't like the idea of the existence of a reserve being hidden until the end of the main auction but it's not quite as bad as I thought. Like I say, I really like the overall format of RR's auctions but this is one issue that bugs me. |
freshspot unregistered
|
posted 04-23-2017 04:23 AM
spaced out - I disagree with you. Bidding against the reserve is no different than bidding against another bidder. In either case, you have no idea how high the price will go, the main action happens after 7:00, and in either case it is your wallet and desire that leads to you pushing the button again (or not). With RR Auction, placing an early bid to ensure you can participate after 7:00 is the best strategy so you can figure out which item(s) you want to chase after 7:00. |
Chuckster01 Member Posts: 873 From: Orlando, FL Registered: Jan 2014
|
posted 04-23-2017 07:20 AM
I have never understood the 7 p.m. rule? As an auction is designed to sell an item for the highest possible price for a seller, why would you exclude all the bidders who did not put in an early bid as there may be money left on the table for the seller and the auction house? I love the 30-minute rule and wish that could be carried to all auction formats. It would stop the last 10 second rush on eBay and timed auctions. Live auctions always give a warning the auction is about to end allowing for another bid. |
jtheoret Member Posts: 344 From: Albuquerque, NM USA Registered: Jul 2003
|
posted 04-23-2017 12:26 PM
quote: Originally posted by freshspot: With RR Auction, placing an early bid to ensure you can participate after 7:00 is the best strategy so you can figure out which item(s) you want to chase after 7:00.
I agree that's the best strategy, it's what I do, bid early low on some items I am interested in, follow progress and then participate again after 7:00 if price isn't too high and I'm still interested. RR always has great stuff, but prices often tend to be higher than I'm willing to spend on particular items - virtually impossible to get a steal! |
holcombeyates Member Posts: 243 From: UK Registered: Dec 2010
|
posted 04-24-2017 02:43 AM
I much prefer the RR strategy as it allows time and gives you an opportunity for a contingency running in parallel.It would be great if they offered a post auction buy it now facility... |
rgarner Member Posts: 1193 From: Shepperton, United Kingdom Registered: Mar 2012
|
posted 04-24-2017 05:39 AM
A post auction buy it now is a good idea, I think that would help the reserve issue, at least in part. |
nasaliftoff Member Posts: 13 From: FL Registered: Apr 2017
|
posted 04-25-2017 06:39 PM
In my opinion, all reserves should be clearly shown and if an auction house bids against their bidders that should also be clearly shown so the bidder realizes that is what is taking place.It's either an auction or a sale. Since there is a minimum bid there really is no reason to have reserves. |
Chuckster01 Member Posts: 873 From: Orlando, FL Registered: Jan 2014
|
posted 04-25-2017 07:08 PM
If I am not mistaken all RR auctions start at $200 regardless of value? |
fredtrav Member Posts: 1673 From: Birmingham AL Registered: Aug 2010
|
posted 04-25-2017 11:09 PM
That is not correct. Most start at $200. Other at $300, 500, 1000 and up.By the way, I thought the shipping has gotten rather high on this auction. And a post-auction Buy it Now would be a great feature. It has been mentioned before but for some reason, they choose not to do this. |