Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Soviet - Russian Space
  Remembering Soyuz 1 (April 23-24, 1967)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Remembering Soyuz 1 (April 23-24, 1967)
Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-24-2017 08:58 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Today (April 24, 2017) marks 50 years since the end of the first crewed flight of a Russian Soyuz spacecraft and the first in-flight fatality in the history of spaceflight. You can read about the mission on Anatoly Zak's Russian Space Web.
On April 23, 1967, after more than a two-year gap in human space flight, the Soviet Union announced the launch of a new-generation spacecraft called Soyuz-1 ("union") with a veteran cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov onboard. Customary for the secretive Soviet space program, the official report contained generalized statements about testing of a new spaceship but no details on its design or its mission. However, the next day, the USSR followed up with the announcement that Komarov had tragically died on landing due to a failure of the parachute system.
NASA's astronauts sent the following telegram to the USSR National Academy of Sciences in the wake of the tragedy:
We are very saddened by the loss of Col. Komarov. We feel comradeship for this test pilot because we have met several of his fellow cosmonauts and we know that we are all involved in a pioneering flight effort that is not without hazard. We particularly want to express our deep sense of sympathy to Mrs. Komarov, their children and his fellow cosmonauts.
(As this is intended to be a discussion thread rather than a memorial topic, please forgo moment of silence ["."] posts.)

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-24-2017 04:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Asif Siddiqi revisits Soyuz-1 for The Space Review.
This is an attempt to use the transcripts, along with other Russian language sources, to offer a new and comprehensive account of this deeply misunderstood mission.

Wehaveliftoff
Member

Posts: 2343
From:
Registered: Aug 2001

posted 04-24-2017 10:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Wehaveliftoff     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Any notes anywhere as to the discipline of those working on that parachute system?

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-25-2017 09:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Per Siddiqi's "Challenge to Apollo" (SP-4408):
The one major casualty of the post-Soyuz I investigation was Chief Designer Tkachev of the Scientific-Research and Experimental Institute of the Parachute-Landing Service who had designed the Soyuz parachute system. Although the unofficial version clearly exonerated his organization of any blame, Tkachev was fired from his job in 1968, ending his role in designing the parachute systems for Vostok, Voskhod, Zenit, Soyuz, and many other Soviet spacecraft of the era. Two parachute testing failures following Soyuz I apparently sealed his fate.
The mention of the "unofficial version" refers to what Siddiqi describes as the more likely cause of the accident (as opposed to the official version, friction preventing the parachutes from deploying correctly).
...one that attributed the accident to gross negligence on the part of technicians at TsKBEM's manufacturing plant. During preflight preparations, the two Soyuz ships had been coated with thermal protection materials and then delivered into a high-temperature test chamber to polymerize the synthetic resin. In the case of the two Soyuz ships for the April 1967 mission, technicians tested the vehicles in the chamber with their parachute containers, but apparently without the covers for the containers.

In Deputy Chief Designer Chertok's investigation of the matter in the early 1990s, he could not find anyone still alive who could remember why the covers had been left off. Because of the omission of the covers, the interiors of the parachute containers were coated with a polymerized coating, which formed a very rough surface, thus eventually preventing the parachute from deploying on Soyuz I.

Clearly, the most chilling implication of this manufacturing oversight was that both Soyuz spacecraft were doomed to failure — that is, if Komarov had not faced any troubles in orbit and the Soyuz 2 launch had gone on as scheduled, all four cosmonauts would have certainly died on return.

The unofficial cause of the accident was never included in the official report on Soyuz I, partly because those at the manufacturing plant who knew of the violation of testing procedure chose to remain silent on the issue so as not to incriminate themselves.

ColinBurgess
Member

Posts: 2031
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2003

posted 04-25-2017 05:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ColinBurgess   Click Here to Email ColinBurgess     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
One of the most frightening aspects of this story, as the late Rex Hall and I discussed in our co-authored book "The First Soviet Cosmonaut Team," was that the same fault was later found in the parachute system of the Soyuz-2 spacecraft. Had the three-man launch taken place the next day as planned, there is every likelihood the Soviets would not only have lost Vladimir Komarov, but Valery Bykovsky, Alexei Yeliseyev and Yevgeny Khrunov.

One can only imagine the impact that would have had on the Soviet space program. It looks as if this will be discussed in the second part of the article, which I look forward to reading.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement