Author
|
Topic: Spotted in the sky above Kennedy Space Center
|
Tom Dahl Member Posts: 33 From: MA, USA Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted 03-07-2015 08:23 PM
I visited the Kennedy Space Center visitor complex on Feb. 15, and captured hundreds of digital photographs with a Nikon D300 camera body and Nikkor 18-200mm lens. I'm currently processing them to tweak exposure, add captions, etc. prior to posting on a large web album. One photograph has something or some image defect that I cannot identify, and I would be very interested in how others might do photo interpretation of this case. There are what appear to be three small spots in the sky above the base fins of the Saturn IB main subject. Here is the overall image:Here is a crop of a 100% portion showing the artifact(s) in question: And here is a crop enlarged to 400%: The image was captured during mid-day in a virtually cloudless sky. If those pixels represent three objects, the light distribution (particularly what could be specular reflections) seems reasonably consistent with the sun illumination angle as depicted in the ground shadows (i.e., from the upper left). At the time I was not aware of prominent aircraft noises, but it was a windy day and I was concentrating on the foreground subject. No other image has similar artifacts that I have yet found. I'm quite familiar with this camera and lens combination, having shot about 23K frames with it. (I am not posting this as a joke or stunt. It is an actual photograph I captured with something a puzzle in the image.) |
PeterO Member Posts: 399 From: North Carolina Registered: Mar 2002
|
posted 03-07-2015 08:54 PM
My guess would be three birds - egrets, seagulls or the like - flying right to left, with their wings at full down stroke. |
mach3valkyrie Member Posts: 719 From: Albany, Oregon Registered: Jul 2006
|
posted 03-07-2015 09:02 PM
Looks like reflection off some type of metallic objects to me. |
space1 Member Posts: 853 From: Danville, Ohio Registered: Dec 2002
|
posted 03-07-2015 09:09 PM
I agree with Peter. Birds. |
JBoe Member Posts: 959 From: Churchton, MD Registered: Oct 2012
|
posted 03-07-2015 09:18 PM
I wasn't really looking at the three objects so much as that fin. It doesn't look as "tapered" as the one below. Did they replace it? |
Tom Dahl Member Posts: 33 From: MA, USA Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted 03-07-2015 09:57 PM
Regarding the Saturn IB's fins, they all look about the same to me in images (not yet published) from other angles.
|
TLIGuy Member Posts: 205 From: Virginia Registered: Jul 2013
|
posted 03-07-2015 11:40 PM
I'll take 3 mylar balloons for $300 Alex. |
GACspaceguy Member Posts: 2474 From: Guyton, GA Registered: Jan 2006
|
posted 03-08-2015 06:58 AM
quote: Originally posted by JBoe: It doesn't look as "tapered" as the one below.
It looks to just be a camera angle illusion. Hard to say from a still rather than being there and seeing the movement but I agree either birds or balloons |
Joel Katzowitz Member Posts: 808 From: Marietta GA USA Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 03-08-2015 08:57 AM
I'm going with birds.... |
Skythings Member Posts: 243 From: Registered: Jun 2014
|
posted 03-08-2015 12:20 PM
I had a similar occurrence while photographing a model of the Wright Flyer aircraft in my front yard back in July of 2008. At the time I never noticed anything in the frame while I was photographing it. I took a total of 28 images and this was the only one with something unusual. So I do not think it was anything on the lens. I felt it could be a bird at first, but I have lots of images I have taken with birds inadvertently flying through a picture and never are they fuzzy. |
Rick Mulheirn Member Posts: 4167 From: England Registered: Feb 2001
|
posted 03-08-2015 12:37 PM
Pelicans. |
David Carey Member Posts: 782 From: Registered: Mar 2009
|
posted 03-08-2015 01:35 PM
Did a little more image enhancement of your original and I'm going with a flock of CM Boilerplates returning home to roost in the Rocket Garden. (But, yes, I agree with "birds.") |
Joel Katzowitz Member Posts: 808 From: Marietta GA USA Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 03-09-2015 08:56 AM
Regarding the "fuzzy" bird image, your camera settings can certainly have an impact. The aperture setting will affect depth of field (how much of the image is in focus) and the shutter speed will affect motion blur (moving objects won't be sharp). |
JSC01 Member Posts: 84 From: Houston, Texas, USA Registered: Nov 2011
|
posted 03-19-2015 11:29 AM
"The truth is out there." — MulderClearly these are UFOs. |