Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Mercury - Gemini - Apollo
  Apollo: Why only one geologist in Group 4?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Apollo: Why only one geologist in Group 4?
carmelo
Member

Posts: 1051
From: Messina, Sicilia, Italia
Registered: Jun 2004

posted 09-06-2016 12:01 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for carmelo   Click Here to Email carmelo     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
NASA's Group 4, the first group of astronaut-scientists, was selected in 1965 at the apex of Apollo program. Six men were selected, three physicists, two physicians and a geologist.

In 1965-66 were expected many flights on the moon, and subsequently a moon base as next logical step. No one imagined that the exploration of the moon would be closed after only six landing missions.

So why NASA selected only one geologist (Schmitt) in the Group 4?

Mike Dixon
Member

Posts: 1428
From: Kew, Victoria, Australia
Registered: May 2003

posted 09-06-2016 01:25 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mike Dixon   Click Here to Email Mike Dixon     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Perhaps NASA thought that astronaut training in that field might suffice?

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 43576
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 09-06-2016 02:06 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The scientist-astronauts were selected at the urging of the National Academy of Sciences; NASA itself was not interested in sending scientists to the moon. As the late Curt Michel said:
When we were selected at the urging of the National Academy, the idea was they wanted scientists to be sent to the moon. But when we got in, the astronaut office's idea was to use the scientists after the lunar missions.
By 1965, the public may not have been expecting an early end to Apollo, but NASA was acutely aware that the program would be limited.

Before he died, President Kennedy rejected NASA's requests to expand Apollo's scope beyond the political goals that defined it. Even under Johnson's lead, the moon landings were a secondary priority after the problems faced on domestic and foreign fronts. By the time Nixon took office, enthusiasm for the moon landings had all but evaporated both in the White House and on Capitol Hill.

The public may have dreamt of future moon bases, and small divisions within NASA may have even drawn up plans, but there was little to no political support for anything much beyond Apollo 11, and thus, no need or desire for more geologists.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement