|
Author
|
Topic: Advice on flown status of Soyuz covers
|
WileECoyoteIT
Member Posts: 60
From: Italy
Registered: Jul 2016
|
posted 06-05-2019 06:01 AM
  
I've just acquired a bunch of flown(?) covers and I kindly request your professional advice on their authenticity having no COA. Soyuz 28 Soyuz 38  Soyuz 39  Soyuz 39  Soyuz TM-6  |
cosmos-walter
Member Posts: 691
From: Salzburg, Austria
Registered: Jun 2003
|
posted 06-07-2019 07:53 AM
The first three covers are not flown. The second Soyuz 39 may be flown. I have some concerns about Soyuz TM-6.Of course, for serious examination the originals would be needed. |
WileECoyoteIT
Member Posts: 60
From: Italy
Registered: Jul 2016
|
posted 06-07-2019 09:13 AM
Thanks for your kind reply. Can you please give me some hints on why the first three should not be flown? The TM-6? Thanks! |
Cozmosis22
Member Posts: 968
From: Texas * Earth
Registered: Apr 2011
|
posted 06-07-2019 10:49 AM
The second Soyuz 39 has both cozmo postmarks, as noted over here, entry 32. |
WileECoyoteIT
Member Posts: 60
From: Italy
Registered: Jul 2016
|
posted 06-08-2019 05:30 AM
Thanks for your time. If I got the point: - Soyuz 23 is not flown because lacking the B-1 onboard stamp
- Soyuz 38 is not flown because lacking the Cuban on board stamp IB-7
- Soyuz 39 (the addressed one) is not flown because lacking the C-8 pentagonal stamp and so stamped on earth at the return
- Second Soyuz 39 should be flown
- Soyuz TM-6 should be flown
Thanks for your kind feedback and support. |
advertisement