|
Author
|
Topic: Breese Little (UK): Vintage NASA Photographs
|
Robert Pearlman
Editor Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 11-27-2016 02:04 PM
   
Vintage NASA Photographs, a trading arm of Breese Little Gallery in London, is launching its second collection original NASA lithographs and glossy photographs on Monday (Nov. 28). We've mounted two major exhibitions of vintage NASA photographs, "For All Mankind: Vintage NASA Photographs 1964-1983" and
"Encountering the Astronomical Sublime: Vintage NASA Photographs 1961-1980." Both of these received global press coverage with BBC, The Guardian, The Spectator, Wired, The Washington Post, The Huffington Post, Daily Mail, Photomonitor, NBC News, Shortlist and many more. The gallery has also mounted successful presentations of vintage NASA photographs at Photo Shanghai (2014), Paris Photo Los Angeles (2015) and the London Art Fair (2015). As well as selling vintage NASA photographs we have written extensively on the subject, including "For All Mankind: A Brief Cultural History of the Moon," published by The White Review. In 2015 the gallery hosted dark frame/deep field, an exhibition curated by Dr Melanie Vandenbrouck and Dr Marek Kukula. For those in the area, Breese Little will host a champagne reception on Dec. 1 from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. to celebrate the launch of the new collection. |
Chuckster01
Member Posts: 873
From: Orlando, FL
Registered: Jan 2014
|
posted 04-05-2017 06:10 PM
I was wondering if anyone had ever had dealings with website called Vintage NASA Photographs.They are selling vintage photos at prices that boggle my mind. Please take a look and give me your opinion. Editor's note: Threads merged. |
Ken Havekotte
Member Posts: 2914
From: Merritt Island, Florida, Brevard
Registered: Mar 2001
|
posted 04-05-2017 06:11 PM
Nope, never heard of them. So if 1200 pounds is one of their asking prices for a single (and original) NASA color glossy photo, does that round out to be almost $1500? Wow! |
Panther494
Member Posts: 402
From: London UK
Registered: Jan 2013
|
posted 04-05-2017 06:12 PM
Haven't had any dealings with them. I'm afraid I don't think i ever will. Ed White NASA negative number S65-30433, for £9000, it is large, 27.8 x 35.6 but even so. |
J.L
Member Posts: 674
From: Bloomington, Illinois, USA
Registered: May 2005
|
posted 04-05-2017 10:39 PM
Something smells... |
Wehaveliftoff
Member Posts: 2343
From:
Registered: Aug 2001
|
posted 04-07-2017 02:06 AM
That 1200 pound Buzz Aldrin photo at the foot of the LM, wasn't that the only one of Neil Armstrong? |
Robert Pearlman
Editor Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 04-07-2017 02:50 AM
There were three photographs that included Neil Armstrong on the lunar surface; that is not one of them. The only full body shot of Armstrong working at the lunar module can be seen here. |
advertisement