Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Opinions & Advice
  331650519094: John Young signed cover

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   331650519094: John Young signed cover
fredtrav
Member

Posts: 1673
From: Birmingham AL
Registered: Aug 2010

posted 09-10-2015 02:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for fredtrav   Click Here to Email fredtrav     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Here is a "John Young" signature that is guaranteed authentic. An Eagle Scout got it signed personally at a parade. I think it belongs in the Hall of Shame.

astrobock
Member

Posts: 138
From: WV, USA
Registered: Sep 2006

posted 09-10-2015 08:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for astrobock   Click Here to Email astrobock     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Considering the circumstances of how the signature was obtained I think it could be authentic. Not a typical signature but there are traits about it that look right in my opinion. Curious what others think.

randy
Member

Posts: 2176
From: West Jordan, Utah USA
Registered: Dec 1999

posted 09-10-2015 08:51 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for randy   Click Here to Email randy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I agree, definitely a Hall of Shame candidate.

neo1022
Member

Posts: 281
From: Santa Monica, CA
Registered: Jun 2013

posted 09-10-2015 11:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for neo1022   Click Here to Email neo1022     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Although the signature is quite irregular, the parade context would explain it. But more convincing to me is the elaborate display (clearly put together by a young person) to feature this treasured item. I'm sure he wouldn't go to this amount of trouble for something he'd forged...

18blue78
Member

Posts: 126
From: UK
Registered: Aug 2013

posted 09-11-2015 12:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for 18blue78     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
By no means an expert opinion but a big flag for me would be the stating price.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 09-11-2015 12:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It is certainly not a typical signature, but like some have said, there are certain traits to it that could point to it being an authentic but rushed signature.

The committee member's badge offers a means of access to Young, and the other memorabilia helps to put the owner at that time and place as well.

As for the starting price, well, the medals and the badge are probably worth more than the $10 being asked, and if I was a forger who went to the trouble of gathering all of the period memorabilia, I probably would take the opposite approach: setting a high price to help sell that the piece is real.

Ultimately, it is a leap of faith for any potential bidder...

Steve Zarelli
Member

Posts: 731
From: Upstate New York, USA
Registered: Mar 2001

posted 09-11-2015 08:57 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Steve Zarelli   Click Here to Email Steve Zarelli     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Note that the signature is one continuous line from beginning to end. Not a likely choice for a forger. It also has some subtle positive traits.

Forced to make a choice, I think it may very well be an authentic walking signature.

That said, without verified exemplars to back it up, it is not "authenticatable" in my opinion. And, even if you knew with certainty it was authentic, it's not a desirable example and would be worth a small fraction of a prime example.

neo1022
Member

Posts: 281
From: Santa Monica, CA
Registered: Jun 2013

posted 09-12-2015 02:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for neo1022   Click Here to Email neo1022     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Not all autographs are created equal... And as with anything, as the signature becomes separated from its owner-specific provenance (which in this case is just about all that seems to give it credibility), all you're left with is a non-typical (although perhaps authentic) signature that no "expert" is willing to stake their good reputation on...

So, I guess this provides a good lesson for us all — lots of genuine signatures can't or won't be authenticated, which doesn't make them forgeries, just very poor candidates for collector acquisition. And these will only become less "authenticatable" as time goes on... All great points, Steve!

spaceflori
Member

Posts: 1499
From: Germany
Registered: May 2000

posted 09-12-2015 01:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for spaceflori   Click Here to Email spaceflori     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I've seen some covers (no example by hand) signed by Young in "almost" one line on covers from around STS-1 and STS-9. So time matches and some traits like the "g" and the "o" make it indeed look good to me as well.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement