Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Exploration: Moon to Mars
  Standard for Coordinated Lunar Time (LTC)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Standard for Coordinated Lunar Time (LTC)
Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 52174
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-03-2024 09:31 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The White House's Office of Science and Technology has directed NASA to develop a new standardized time for use when working and living on the moon to be called Coordinated Lunar Time (LTC). The agency has until 2026 to develop a strategy for its implementation and adoption.
Over the next decade, the United States will work with allies and partners to return humans to the Moon and develop capabilities to enable an enduring presence. During this same period, the U.S. government (USG) anticipates that many other actors, including governments and private industry, will also send spacecraft to operate in Cislunar space — namely to the lunar surface, in lunar orbits, and at the Earth- Moon Lagrange points.

A unified time standard will be foundational to these efforts. The National Cislunar S&T Strategy calls for the United States to establish a sustainable "Cislunar ecosystem" with scalable and interoperable position, navigation, and timing (PNT) infrastructure. U.S. leadership in defining a suitable standard — one that achieves the accuracy and resilience required for operating in the challenging lunar environment — will benefit all spacefaring nations.

Knowledge of time in distant operating regimes is fundamental to the scientific discovery, economic development, and international collaboration that form the basis of U.S. leadership in space. There will be an increasing need for the USG to collaborate with other entities interested in operating in Cislunar space on a broad range of capabilities, standards, and infrastructure. Time standardization will be a necessary foundation to enable interoperability across the USG and international partners, promote safe and sustainable operations, and simplify Space Situational Awareness (SSA) for safety of flight and operations. Key technical background information is summarized below:

  1. UTC is the primary time standard used by Earth-based systems today. The UTC standard is based on the theoretical ideal, Terrestrial Time, which is an analytical definition for time at mean sea level, taking into account the Earth's center of mass. International Atomic Time (TAI) is the primary realization of this ideal time, produced through a weighted average of hundreds of atomic clocks around the world. UTC differs from TAI by an integer number of "leap seconds" inserted periodically to keep UTC aligned with Earth solar days, despite changes in the rate of Earth's rotation.

  2. Relativity poses challenges to extending operations into Cislunar space and beyond. Due to general and special relativity, the length of a second defined on Earth will appear distorted to an observer under different gravitational conditions, or to an observer moving at a high relative velocity. For example, to an observer on the Moon, an Earth-based clock will appear to lose on average 58.7 microseconds per Earth-day with additional periodic variations. This holds important implications for developing standards and capabilities for operating on or around the Moon.

    Additionally, the navigation accuracy a system can achieve with signals from multiple space- based assets, such as a person navigating on Earth with signals from Global Positioning System satellites, depends on the synchronization of those assets with each other. At the Moon, synchronizing each lunar asset with an Earth-based time standard is difficult — due to relativistic effects, events that appear simultaneous at the Earth (e.g., the start of a broadcast signal) are not simultaneous to an observer at the Moon.

    Safety of navigation in Cislunar space also relies on a consistent definition of time among users.

    This includes SSA and continuity of time knowledge during transit operations. PNT systems provide distance measurements by multiplying the time of flight of the signal by the speed of light. Failing to account for the discrepancy between a transmitter clock on the Earth and how it is perceived by a receiver on the Moon will result in a ranging error. Precision applications such as spacecraft docking or landing will require greater accuracy than current methods allow.

    Beyond these operational challenges, the direct use of UTC at the Moon (i.e., without correction) as the local time scale would have cascading effects for applications that require precise metrology. International System of Units (SI) core unit definitions, including the meter and kilogram, rely on the SI definition of time. Due to relativistic effects, a non-SI unit would introduce uncertainty in core unit definitions. These types of errors will have undesired impacts, such as reducing the accuracy of mapping and inertial navigation products. Defining a local time scale can provide a stable reference point for these base units and conversions that must be independently realized on the surface of the Moon.

Axman
Member

Posts: 431
From: Derbyshire UK
Registered: Mar 2023

posted 04-03-2024 10:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Axman   Click Here to Email Axman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm not sure I see the need for a separate coordinated lunar time. Firstly, I think it is eminently feasible to extend UTC to the moon with an algorithm that smooths out the discrepancies.

Secondly, the Webb telescope is operating adequately at the Lagrange point on UTC alone, despite having relativistic time effects to signals sent when setting up the mirror arrays — none of which compromised its operation.

Thirdly, by the very nature of space-time a coordinated lunar time standard at the lunar surface would work less adequately than the UTC and TAI on Earth because the lunar mascons are so much more extreme than geo-mass concentrations.

And fourthly, even with a coordinated lunar standard time, adjustments would still be required for craft travelling cis-lunar and in lunar orbit, so why not just do one adjustment to UTC for each craft, person or base's location in relationship to Greenwich?

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 52174
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-03-2024 02:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Preceding the White House OSTP's interest in a Cooordinated Lunat Time, NASA and the European Space Agency identified a need for such a "Lunar Time System Standard" in their draft for a LunaNet Interoperability Specification.
The use of a common lunar reference time across LNSP infrastructure elements is required to enable synchronization of services and time in the lunar domain. This common lunar reference time is described in detail in Lunar Time System Standard (TBD).
Neither NASA or ESA specify what the standard should be, hence OSTP defining it.

Headshot
Member

Posts: 1299
From: Vancouver, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2012

posted 04-03-2024 05:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Headshot   Click Here to Email Headshot     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I wonder if the Chinese and Russians will agree to use this system as well.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 1999-2024 collectSPACE. All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement