Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Space Explorers & Workers
  46 astronauts may never get to fly

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   46 astronauts may never get to fly
Hart Sastrowardoyo
Member

Posts: 3445
From: Toms River, NJ
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 03-06-2005 10:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Hart Sastrowardoyo   Click Here to Email Hart Sastrowardoyo     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
So sez AOL News:
http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20050306134509990001&_ccc=5&cid=842


But what's interesting is the caption of the photo: "Andy Thomas, left, has helped others prepare for space walks, but has never flown in space himself."

Uh, didn't he fly on the last shuttle-Mir flight? I know he was originally an alternate, and thus wasn't supposed to have flown. but....

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 03-06-2005 10:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ironically, I was just discussing this article with someone offline when your post appeared.

Assuming the count of 142 astronauts provided by the article includes Group 19, then without them: 128 astronauts over 22 planned flights (according to Space.com) would still leave 26 seats open (assuming 7 people per flight).

Can you share your reasoning that arrived at 46?

Another version of this article also has a caption that identifies Pam Melroy as having not yet flown. Seems an image editor was using an old list...

WAWalsh
Member

Posts: 809
From: Cortlandt Manor, NY
Registered: May 2000

posted 03-06-2005 10:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for WAWalsh   Click Here to Email WAWalsh     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Unless, there are multiple Dr. Thomas out there, I believe this will be Andy Thomas's fourth flight.

ColinBurgess
Member

Posts: 2031
From: Sydney, Australia
Registered: Sep 2003

posted 03-06-2005 11:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ColinBurgess   Click Here to Email ColinBurgess     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Someone at Associated Press has really goofed. I just saw a photo of Pam Melroy on another related site and the caption on her photo (credited to AP) was much the same, saying she has never flown into space.

Hart Sastrowardoyo
Member

Posts: 3445
From: Toms River, NJ
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 03-07-2005 07:12 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Hart Sastrowardoyo   Click Here to Email Hart Sastrowardoyo     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Robert Pearlman:
Can you share your reasoning that arrived at 46?


Don't ask me, ask AOL, or whoever the author was. That was the headline, and it's also reflected in a sentence someplace in the middle, saying that about a third of the almost 150 astronauts may not fly.

Hart Sastrowardoyo
Member

Posts: 3445
From: Toms River, NJ
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 03-07-2005 07:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Hart Sastrowardoyo   Click Here to Email Hart Sastrowardoyo     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sorry, cold-induced thinbking.

When I saw the hed and subhed:

Many U.S. Astronauts May Never Get to Fly /
Forty-Six of the Nation's 142 Astronauts Have Not Flown in Space

I automatically combined the two and came up with "46 astronauts may not fly"- which I don't think is an unreasonable jump. At least, not in my cold-induced stupor.

Bob M
Member

Posts: 1746
From: Atlanta-area, GA USA
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 03-07-2005 10:00 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Bob M   Click Here to Email Bob M     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Hart Sastrowardoyo:

Many U.S. Astronauts May Never Get to Fly /
Forty-Six of the Nation's 142 Astronauts Have Not Flown in Space


By my count, it's 49 active NASA Astronauts who haven't flown - not counting the 11 NASA Ascans from Group 19 and the several International astronauts who are part of Group 17. I'm counting Gregory C. Johnson who has a high position at KSC now and also C.J. "Gus" Loria who had to forfeit his seat on a Shuttle mission because of a physical problem. Both may or may not return to flight status.

I saw somewhere - probably here - that NASA wants to have all unflown astronauts fly (except Group 19) before the Shuttles are retired. So that'd be 49 rookie, unflown astronauts finding seats on a limited number of future Shuttle flights.

Bob Mc.

Hart Sastrowardoyo
Member

Posts: 3445
From: Toms River, NJ
Registered: Aug 2000

posted 03-07-2005 10:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Hart Sastrowardoyo   Click Here to Email Hart Sastrowardoyo     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Bob M:
So that'd be 49 rookie, unflown astronauts finding seats on a limited number of future Shuttle flights.

Bob Mc.


Uh-huh. And it's extremely doubtful NASA going to redo the crews to have say, an experienced commander with six rookies flying for the rest of the shuttle schedule.

Wonder what this does to the other astronauts - both those who have multiple missions and valuable experience, like Ross, and those who may have flown once or twice but believe (and want) to still fly? Coleman was hoping for a third mission, and Altman hoped he would be among those landing on the moon in 2010.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 03-07-2005 10:21 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
At 22 flights, even after flying 49 rookies, you would still have 105 seats remaining, more than enough for all experienced astronauts to get at least one more flight over the next five years (again, excluding the Group 19 ascans who were already informed they would never fly on the Space Shuttle). That would average out to three rookies per flight. You then also have at least 10 more seats on Soyuz, assuming two taxi flights per year with one American on-board and that the U.S. and Russia reach an agreement for Soyuz flights beyond 2006.

[This message has been edited by Robert Pearlman (edited March 07, 2005).]

OV-105
Member

Posts: 816
From: Ridgecrest, CA
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 03-07-2005 06:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for OV-105   Click Here to Email OV-105     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I like how they say that Group 19 will never fly on the shuttle. The one thing I do know is never say never. I bet one or more will fly on the shuttle sometime. When 2010 comes around there will still not be anything that bring up or take down what the shuttle can. I bet we will see the shuttle still fly to the ISS with the MPLM's and a crew of three to four.

star61
Member

Posts: 294
From: Bristol UK
Registered: Jan 2005

posted 03-08-2005 08:38 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for star61   Click Here to Email star61     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If this is all true the atmospere in the astro office must be a bit tense. I would imagine a lot of retirements in the next 3/4 years, opening up several opportunities for G19.

Phil g

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 03-08-2005 03:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Though its not unusual for news agencies to create their own headlines for wire stories, its been interesting to track the angles offered on this story simply by the change in title.

As originally released by the AP, the headline was:
Grounded Astronauts Wonder About Future

From there, we saw a slight rewording:
Future uncertain for nation's astronauts

Quite a few newspapers adopted that version (likely by no coincidence, but rather owned by the same parent company).

CNN rearranged the words but kept the theme:
Astronauts face an uncertain future

Another group of newspapers chose to rephrase the headline as a question:
Grounded astronauts: As the shuttle program nears its end, will they ever get to fly?

News channels that use the AP feed used a more straightforward approach:
Many astronauts haven't made it to space yet

Some newspapers just want to be different.

Dallas Morning News:
Astronauts' route to space uncertain at best

Boston Globe:
Last shuttle astronauts warned they may not fly

Winston-Salem Journal:
Many astronauts wait for a trip into space

Arkansas Democrat-Gazette:
Many astronauts earthbound as shuttle era passes

Seattle Post Intelligencer:
Astronauts told space may be out of reach

Seattle Times:
They also serve: Why Astronauts who never fly aren't disappointed

Kansas City Star:
Astronauts not on a mission

Newark Star Ledgar:
Grounded astronauts look wistfully to sky

Daily Breeze, CA:
NASA astronauts play waiting game

Concord Monitor, NH:
Space calls - can they answer?

Times of India:
Space dreams die young at NASA

Finally, Space.com:
Astronauts Wonder If They'll Ever Fly

Tom
Member

Posts: 1597
From: New York
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 03-13-2005 07:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tom   Click Here to Email Tom     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This is a very interesting topic. There are currently 51 (NASA) astronauts in Groups 16, 17 and 18 who haven't flown yet on the shuttle.
Taking the best year NASA had as far as amount of shuttles launched, in 1985 there were 9 shuttle flights. In those missions there were 25 rookies that flew...that does not include payload specialists. Every one of those flights had a rookie pilot except one. That averages out to about 3 first timers per mission.
With the shuttle now scheduled to fly only ISS missions, and with 3 orbiters, my guess is that we'll have 4 shuttle flights per year.
If we keep the averages the same, we would be sending 12 rookies up per year. If the shuttle flies through 2010, as proposed, that will give us five years or roughly 60 new comers.
My point is that the latest group of astronauts may very well be assigned a shuttle mission before it is phased out.

[This message has been edited by Tom (edited March 13, 2005).]

DavidH
Member

Posts: 1217
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Jun 2003

posted 03-14-2005 11:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for DavidH   Click Here to Email DavidH     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Of course, the new administrator could change that situation, since he's endorsed reducing the number of remaining Shuttle flights.

He's also, however, endorsed accelerating development of CEV, which could balance out opportunities.
http://planetary.org/aimformars/study-summary.html

------------------
http://allthese worlds.hatbag.net/space.php
"America's challenge of today has forged man's destiny of tomorrow." - Commander Eugene Cernan, Apollo 17 Mission, 11 December 1972

BMckay
Member

Posts: 3220
From: MA, USA
Registered: Sep 2002

posted 03-15-2005 07:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BMckay   Click Here to Email BMckay     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
FYI_ Two more experienced astronauts have left the corp or will be leaving shortly. That will reduce the overall number.

Tom
Member

Posts: 1597
From: New York
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 03-15-2005 08:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Tom   Click Here to Email Tom     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Is there a list available of astronauts who have resigned since STS-107?
Thanks.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement