posted 05-17-2013 01:42 PM               

NASA Seeks Proposals for Commercial Operations at Launch Pad 39A

NASA released a synopsis on Friday (May 17) announcing plans to issue an announcement for proposals for the commercial use of Launch Pad 39A at the agency's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The announcement is expected next week.

Use of the pad by industry is designed to encourage commercial space activities along Florida's Space Coast and fully use the historic launch complex.

Launch Pad 39A originally was designed to support NASA's Apollo Program and later was modified to launch space shuttles. Today, the agency is modernizing nearby Launch Pad 39B to support government and commercial launches, including NASA's heavy-lift Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and Orion spacecraft, which will provide an entirely new capability for human exploration beyond low-Earth orbit.

"We remain committed to right-sizing our portfolio by reducing the number of facilities that are underused, duplicative, or not required to support the Space Launch System and Orion," said Kennedy Center Director Bob Cabana. "Launch Complex 39A is not required to support our asteroid retrieval mission or our eventual missions to Mars. But it's in the agency's and our nation's best interest in meeting our commitment and direction to enable commercial space operations and allow the aerospace industry to operate and maintain the pad and related facilities."

Assessments conducted by NASA show Launch Pad 39A could serve as a platform for a commercial space company's launch activities if the company assumes financial and technical responsibility of the complex's operations and management. Commercial use of the pad would further support NASA's goal to encourage the commercial use of property the agency does not need for the foreseeable future.

Kennedy is positioning itself for the next era of space exploration, transitioning to a 21st century launch facility with multiple users, both private and government. A dynamic infrastructure is taking shape, designed to host many kinds of spacecraft and rockets capable of sending people on America's next adventures in space.

To view the announcement, visit Kennedy's Business Opportunities.

posted 07-23-2013 05:52 PM               

Thanks to Amazon.com billionaire Jeff Bezos' backing, Blue Origin is one of the country's most financially stable rocket ventures, but it has also had one of the lowest profiles — until now.

The company, based in an industrial area south of Seattle, is waiting to hear whether it can take over one of NASA's crown jewels: Launch Complex 39A at Kennedy Space Center in Florida, where the first and the last space shuttle flight blasted off. And Bezos is competing with another billionaire, SpaceX's Elon Musk, to get it.

...both Musk and Bezos are eyeing the launch pad because, for all their billions, it's still challenging to build an orbital launch pad from scratch. Kennedy Space Center would be ideal, because it already has the infrastructure as well as the coastal range clearances for orbital launches. As an illustration of how tough it is to create a new pad, SpaceX has been looking into creating a new commercial launch facility for more than two years, but a deal still hasn't been reached.

SpaceX spokeswoman Christina Ra told NBC News that 39A wouldn't take the place of a future commercial launch facility. "Top priorities for 39A would be for commercial crew [launches to the space station] and Falcon Heavy missions, though we'd be able to launch all missions on our East Coast manifest," Ra said in an email.

...Blue Origin would run 39A as a multi-use facility, allowing other launch providers to send their rockets into space from the pad for a price. "We're open to everyone," Meyerson said. "We think we have the technical background and we have the long-term financial commitment to make a multi-user pad at KSC successful."

One of Blue Origin's customers could be United Launch Alliance, which currently sends government and commercial payloads into space from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. ULA's Atlas 5 rocket is slated to be used by two other SpaceX competitors, the Boeing Co. and Sierra Nevada Corp., to send crews and cargo to the space station and perhaps other orbital destinations as early as 2016. Blue Origin may also use the Atlas 5 while it develops its own rocket.

Blue Origin's director of strategy and business development, Bretton Alexander, said ULA and at least one other launch provider are supporting Blue Origin's bid for Launch Complex 39A.

posted 07-26-2013 07:58 AM               

U.S. Reps. Frank Wolf and Robert Aderholt, both members of a House subcommittee that approves NASA budgets, said Launch Complex 39A is a "unique, taxpayer-funded asset" that should be available to multiple rocket launchers.

"It is surprising that NASA appears to be racing to lease LC-39A with little transparency and absent Congressional consent," they wrote to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden.

posted 07-26-2013 12:40 PM            

Just say no to this silly "right-sizing our portfolio" proposal.

posted 07-26-2013 12:51 PM               

The congressmen are not suggesting allocating more funds for the upkeep of the launch pad, so it either needs to be turned over to a commercial entity, which can then fund its required routine maintenance, or it will, sooner than later, become of no use to anyone.

posted 07-26-2013 11:13 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Robert Pearlman:
The congressmen are not suggesting allocating more funds for the upkeep of the launch pad...

---

posted 07-27-2013 12:01 AM               

But let's say it could prioritize... spending money on the upkeep of a launch pad it has no plans to use? That's the very definition of a low priority.

posted 07-27-2013 04:25 AM               

quote:

---

Originally posted by Cozmosis22:
...not to be leased out to a particular company which may be favored by the current Administration.

---

quote:

---

Perhaps, like every other federal agency, NASA needs to take a serious look at prioritizing spending?

---

posted 07-27-2013 10:42 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jim Behling:
Congress dictates the priorities.

---

posted 07-27-2013 11:08 AM               

It is the sense of Congress that NASA needs to re-scope, and as appropriate, down-size, to fit current and future missions and expected funding levels. Eighty percent of NASA's facilities are over 40 years old. Additionally, in a number of areas NASA finds itself "holding onto" facilities and capabilities scaled to another era.

posted 07-28-2013 04:28 AM               

quote:

---

Originally posted by Cozmosis22:
Did Congress dictate that NASA set about destroying old buildings at KSC and propose building a new $25+ million Central Campus Complex for bureaucrats in the industrial area?

---

NASA no longer needs to manage operational vehicles and facilities. That paradigm is no longer applicable or needed.

NASA (and USAF) have incubated and nurtured the launch industry and it no longer needs their hands on experience. The launch experience is in industry (and rightly so) and NASA just has to contract for it versus providing itself.

Hence LC-39A should be given to whom ever is going to use it just like the OPFs, HMF, parachute facility, SLF, etc.

Another paradigm needs to changed, Kennedy Space Center (the organization) should be just a tenant at the larger Cape Canaveral Spaceport versus being an operator of the Kennedy Space Center. Instead of supplying spaceport services, NASA should be contracting them.

posted 07-28-2013 09:34 AM               

Lockheed and Boeing butter both sides of the bread.

posted 08-01-2013 10:22 AM               

Bolden said NASA has no use for 39A, which supported the Apollo and shuttle programs, and planned to demolish it unless there was private sector interest.

Now, he said the agency does not want to continue spending the "couple million bucks" it would cost each year to keep the seaside pad from rusting away.

"The problem is, we cannot afford to maintain a facility while the world thinks about it," he said. "We're either going to demolish it, or we're going to let somebody use it and pay for it."

NASA wants to unload responsibility for the pad by Oct. 1, the start of the new fiscal year.

posted 08-01-2013 10:56 PM               

NASA will evaluate the proposer’s ability to mitigate potential impacts to launch or other operations at KSC or CCAFS.

NASA will evaluate the proposer's capability related to the prevention of potential environmental and safety hazards beyond the LC 39A facility.

Such launches must be approved and licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and NASA expects to be part of that process for purposes of protecting NASA property and persons at the Kennedy Space Center and avoiding interference with NASA launch operations.

posted 08-01-2013 11:02 PM               

NASA will require access to these artifacts with proper coordination, and they cannot be damaged or modified during the term of any agreement:

• Orbiter Access Arm (OAA) U70-0503-99 – Attached to the Fixed Service Structure ~195' level

  
• Gaseous Oxygen Vent Arm (GOX) U78-0001 – Attached to the Fixed Service Structure ~207-227' level 

  
• Emergency Egress Bunker J8-1708– Rubber Room and Blast Room

Other smaller artifacts (e.g., phones and warning lights) will be identified prior to the execution of an agreement.

...NASA has completed notification to the Florida State Historic Preservation Office and no further notifications are required for modifications of the historic places. The Tenant will comply with Artifact recovery requirements as defined in the lease agreement.

posted 08-01-2013 11:27 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Robert Pearlman:
That consideration was included in the request for proposals...

---

posted 08-02-2013 02:12 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by dabolton:
How big of a rocket can use the 39A/B pads before the 3 mile safety limit to the VAB is no longer valid?

---

posted 09-08-2013 11:16 PM               

The protest could impact who ultimately uses the pad, but at a minimum will delay any lease award until the GAO reaches a decision, expected by mid-December.

NASA had hoped to transfer the historic former Apollo and shuttle pad by Oct. 1, the start of a new fiscal year that does not anticipate funding to maintain the facility, estimated at $1.2 million in 2013.

Blue Origin, started by Amazon.com CEO and billionaire Jeff Bezos, would not comment directly on the protest but reiterated its preference for a shared-use arrangement.

"Several major American space launch companies have come forward with interest in operating commercially from (launch complex) 39A and support this multi-user approach," Blue Origin President Rob Meyerson said in a statement. "This is an important issue of national policy and we look forward to working with NASA to expand the use of LC 39A and its return to flight."

NASA must respond to the GAO within 30 days of the protest filed Tuesday.

posted 12-12-2013 06:06 PM               

On Dec. 12, 2013, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) notified NASA that it had denied a protest filed against the Agency by Blue Origin LLC on Sept. 13, 2013. In its protest, Blue Origin raised concerns about the competitive process NASA was using to try to secure a potential commercial partner(s) to lease and maintain the Agency's Launch Complex (LC) 39-A at Kennedy Space Center in Florida. Blue Origin had argued that the language in the "Announcement for Proposals" (AFP) favored one proposed use of LC-39A over others. The GAO disagreed.

The GAO's ruling is posted on the GAO website.

Given today's GAO ruling, NASA is looking forward in the near future to selecting an industry partner for negotiations to lease and operate LC-39A. Permitting use of this valuable national asset by commercial entities will ensure its continued viability and will allow for its continued use in support of U.S. space activities.

The reuse of LC-39A is part of NASA's work to transform the Kennedy Space Center into a 21st-century launch complex capable of supporting both government and commercial users. Kennedy is having success attracting significant private sector interest in its unique facilities. The center is hard at work assembling NASA's Orion spacecraft and preparing its infrastructure for the Space Launch System rocket, which will launch from LC-39B and take American astronauts into deep space, including an asteroid and Mars.

In the meantime, in order to maintain the integrity of the LC-39A competition, NASA will not be commenting on or providing additional information about the LC-39A competition beyond the publicly-released, May 23, 2013 Announcement for Proposals until an agency selection related to LC-39A is made and announced publicly by the agency.

posted 12-13-2013 01:43 PM               

NASA Selects SpaceX to Begin Negotiations for Use of Historic Launch Pad

NASA has selected Space Exploration Technologies Corporation (SpaceX) of Hawthorne, Calif., to begin negotiations on a lease to use and operate historic Launch Complex (LC) 39A at the agency's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

Permitting use and operation of this valuable national asset by a private-sector, commercial space partner will ensure its continued viability and allow for its continued use in support of U.S. space activities.

The reuse of LC-39A is part of NASA’s work to transform the Kennedy Space Center into a 21st century launch complex capable of supporting both government and commercial users. Kennedy is having success attracting significant private sector interest in its unique facilities. The center is hard at work assembling NASA’s Orion spacecraft and preparing its infrastructure for the Space Launch System rocket, which will launch from LC-39B and take American astronauts into deep space, including to an asteroid and Mars.

NASA made the selection decision Thursday after the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) denied a protest filed against the Agency by Blue Origin LLC on Sept. 13. In its protest, Blue Origin raised concerns about the competitive process NASA was using to try to secure a potential commercial partner or partners to lease and use LC-39A. Blue Origin had argued the language in the Announcement for Proposals (AFP) favored one proposed use of LC-39A over others. The GAO disagreed.

While the GAO protest was underway, NASA was prohibited from selecting a commercial partner for LC-39A from among the proposals submitted in response to the agency's AFP that had been issued on May 23. However, while the GAO considered the protest, NASA continued evaluating the proposals in order to be prepared to make a selection when permitted to do so. After the GAO rendered its decision Thursday in NASA’s favor, the agency completed its evaluation and selection process.

NASA notified all proposers on Friday of its selection decision concerning LC-39A. Further details about NASA’s decision will be provided to each proposer when NASA furnishes the source selection statement to the proposers. In addition, NASA will offer each the opportunity to meet to discuss NASA’s findings related to the proposer’s individual proposal. NASA will release the source selection statement to the public once each proposer has been consulted to ensure that any proprietary information has been appropriately redacted.

NASA will begin working with SpaceX to negotiate the terms of its lease for LC-39A. During those ongoing negotiations, NASA will not be able to discuss details of the pending lease agreement.

Since the late 1960s, Kennedy's launch pads 39 A and B have served as the starting point for America's most significant human spaceflight endeavors -- Apollo, Skylab, Apollo-Soyuz and all 135 space shuttle missions. LC-39A is the pad where Apollo 11 lifted off from on the first manned moon landing in 1969, as well as launching the first space shuttle mission in 1981 and the last in 2011.