Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Satellites - Robotic Probes
  [Discuss] SpaceIL's Beresheet lunar missions

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   [Discuss] SpaceIL's Beresheet lunar missions
Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 45219
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-04-2019 08:49 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Please use this topic to discuss SpaceIL's missions to land its Beresheet and Beresheet 2 lunar landers on the moon.

Headshot
Member

Posts: 960
From: Vancouver, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2012

posted 04-04-2019 08:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Headshot   Click Here to Email Headshot     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Any idea where on the lunar surface Beresheet will touch down?

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 45219
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-04-2019 08:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The 5-foot-tall (1.5 m) lander is planned to touchdown in an area that is 20-square-miles (30 square-km).
"Our landing site is Mare Serenitatis. In English, it is the 'Quiet Sea,'" said [spacecraft program director Yigal] Harel, referring to an area on the moon also known as the Sea of Serenity.

Located adjacent to the Sea of Tranquility where NASA's Apollo 11 mission made the first moon landing by astronauts 50 years ago, Mare Serenitatis is also near the landing sites of the Apollo 17 mission in 1972 and the Soviet Union's Luna 21 robotic mission in 1973.

"We chose this place because it has a magnetic field and we want, as a scientific mission, to measure the magnetic field there," said Harel.

damnyankee36
Member

Posts: 43
From: Alamogordo, NM USA
Registered: Aug 2017

posted 04-04-2019 01:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for damnyankee36   Click Here to Email damnyankee36     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Why is the lander only going to operate for a few days after landing? Is it a power issue? I assume that since it is now being powered by solar energy why can’t it continue operating on the surface in the same manner?

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 45219
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-04-2019 02:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Most of the science objectives for this mission, which is more of a technology demonstrator, will be completed during the descent to the surface. The lander will succumb to the extreme temperatures on the moon, as explained by Jason Davis with The Planetary Society:
Beresheet is landing at sunrise, when temperatures are not too hot, and not too cold. Those benign conditions won't last for long; as the Sun rises, so will the temperature, which will cook the lander. The cameras are only designed to withstand temperatures up to 90 degrees Celsius in storage or 85 degrees while in use; lunar midday temperatures can top 100 degrees. If Beresheet manages to survive the heat, the lunar night will likely finish it off.

damnyankee36
Member

Posts: 43
From: Alamogordo, NM USA
Registered: Aug 2017

posted 04-05-2019 02:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for damnyankee36   Click Here to Email damnyankee36     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks Robert. I suspected it was heat related but was unsure because I'm not sure how, in the vacuum of space, the temps are more extreme on the moon's surface compared to in orbit.

Can you explain the reason how the surface affects the temperature?

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 45219
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-08-2019 02:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
In transit (flying through space), the spacecraft is subjected to the same temperatures but it can revolve (so called barbecue mode) so no one side is baking or freezing for extended periods of time. The spacecraft's science instruments can also be powered off.

On the surface, the instruments are powered on and one down, the spacecraft becomes a static target. There is also the additional heat that is radiated off the lunar surface.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 45219
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-08-2019 07:23 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
More about the landing site from the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs:
Beresheet lunar landing site revealed

The selection criteria for the selected lunar landing site focused on ensuring a safe landing, searching for sites with relatively few craters, exposed rocks or steep slopes within the landing area that could jeopardize the touchdown.

The main scientific instrument on board the Israeli Beresheet spacecraft, the SpaceIL Magnetometer (SILMAG), has now been successfully turned on in space and data returned to Earth. After its successful launch, Beresheet is circling Earth on its journey to the Moon. Prof. Oded Aharonson of the Weizmann Institute of Science is heading the team that is currently analyzing the SILMAG information to evaluate the health and accuracy of the instrument in space, as well as recording the magnetic signature of the spacecraft itself, which will then be subtracted from the measurements made on the Moon.

Measuring the magnetism of lunar rocks will enable researchers to address outstanding questions about the Moon: how it acquired its magnetic field, and when in its history this occurred.

Aharonson and his team of scientists, working with the SpaceIL engineers, have identified a landing site for the Beresheet lander. The selection criteria focused on ensuring a safe landing, searching for sites with relatively few craters, exposed rocks or steep slopes within the landing area that could jeopardize the touchdown. In addition, the scientists searched for a location on the Moon where the crust is magnetic, so as to allow the magnetometer on board the spacecraft to carry out its investigation.

The landing site was selected together with Prof. Jim Head of Brown University​, a member of the SpaceIL team who worked with the NASA Apollo program on landing site selection, among other things. "On the basis of our experience with Apollo, the Serenitatis sites favor both landing safety and scientific reward," he said.

The chosen site is located in the northeastern part of Mare Serenitatis, a few hundreds of km east of the Apollo 15 landing site and a similar distance northwest of the Apollo 17 site. Three optional landing sites (primary and two backups) were identified. The terrain in these locations is composed of material characteristic of ancient mare surfaces on which successful landings have been made (most recently Chang'E 3 and 4). "Lunar magnetism has been an enigma for decades. It is a privilege to be part of this mission that's taking one more step towards solving it," said Aharonson.

The Beresheet spacecraft is currently orbiting Earth and performing maneuvers in preparation for lunar orbit insertion in early April, followed by the planned landing at the chosen site.

Blackarrow
Member

Posts: 3240
From: Belfast, United Kingdom
Registered: Feb 2002

posted 04-11-2019 02:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Blackarrow     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sadly, it's a Surveyor 2 situation, not Surveyor 1.

A brave attempt, and it was looking so good, but when that descent-rate started climbing into the red-zone, it was all over.

Over to Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter...

RobertB
Member

Posts: 196
From: Israel
Registered: Nov 2012

posted 04-11-2019 02:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for RobertB   Click Here to Email RobertB     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
So close... Last telemetry was at 149 meters.

oly
Member

Posts: 1122
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: Apr 2015

posted 04-12-2019 02:15 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for oly   Click Here to Email oly     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
A great effort that hopefully inspires more missions such as this. All involved should be congratulated. It is a shame about the ending.

Fra Mauro
Member

Posts: 1703
From: Bethpage, N.Y.
Registered: Jul 2002

posted 04-12-2019 08:27 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Fra Mauro   Click Here to Email Fra Mauro     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
A great effort to be sure. I was surprised and inspired by their attitude after the failure. Upbeat and positive, with the assurance of continued exploration. It's something we can learn from.

Cozmosis22
Member

Posts: 1054
From: Texas * Earth
Registered: Apr 2011

posted 04-12-2019 12:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Cozmosis22     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Some kind and encouraging words from Buzz Aldrin via Twitter:
Condolences to the Beresheet lander team a SpaceIL for what almost was! Communications were lost with the spacecraft just 150 meters (!!!) above the surface, and it couldn't quite stick the landing. Never lose hope - your hard work, teamwork, and innovation is inspiring to all!

SpaceAngel
Member

Posts: 340
From: Maryland
Registered: May 2010

posted 04-12-2019 12:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAngel   Click Here to Email SpaceAngel     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Do you think this crash is somewhat similar to the Mars Polar Lander failure in 1999?

Glint
Member

Posts: 1050
From: New Windsor, Maryland USA
Registered: Jan 2004

posted 04-12-2019 06:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Glint   Click Here to Email Glint     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Was that the one where the legs deployed during descent with such force that a sensor erroneously thought it indicated touchdown, shut down the engine, and then it fell the rest of the way?

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 45219
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-13-2019 02:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes, which would rule out Beresheet's failure as being similar to Mars Polar Lander as the earlier's landing legs were deployed after initially reaching Earth orbit and the main engine did fire (and, apparently, was restarted after the dropout but too late to be effective).

SpaceIL chairman Morris Kahn has announced that the team will try again.

The dream goes on! Morris Kahn just announced the launching of Beresheet 2.0.
Also, journalist Leonard David reports that NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter will image the site of the impact and look for signs that a NASA payload may have survived.
A NASA piggyback experiment may have survived the April 11 crash landing of Israel's Moon lander, Beresheet. Overflight of the crash site by the space agency's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) should provide imagery of the impact area.

Additionally, an LRO-carried Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) will attempt to detect a NASA-provided laser retro-reflector array in the Beresheet wreckage zone. Called the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/MIT Laser Retro-reflector Array (LRA) for Lunar Landers, the ball-shaped device was located on the top side of the Israeli lander.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 45219
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 04-16-2019 06:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
National Geographic Channel will air "Rookie Moonshot: Budget Mission to the Moon" on Thursday (April 25) at 9 p.m. EDT.
"Rookie Moonshot: Budget Mission to the Moon" is the remarkable story of a small company with a huge dream — to become the first to land a privately funded unmanned vehicle on the moon. The 60-minute special follows the Israeli nonprofit organization SpaceIL as it attempts to land its spacecraft, Beresheet, on the lunar surface.

Despite the company's best efforts, the spacecraft suffers a software glitch and crashes just hundreds of feet from the lunar surface. Although SpaceIL doesn't accomplish its monumental goal, it does make Israel one of only seven countries to orbit the moon.

The film features exclusive behind-the-scenes access to mission control; Beresheet’s risky landing attempt; and interviews with SpaceIL’s founders, engineers and space experts to give key insights into the ambitious mission.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 45219
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 05-15-2019 10:13 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) release
Beresheet Crash Site Spotted!

SpaceIL, an Israeli non-profit organization, is dedicated to landing the first Israeli spacecraft on the Moon. Beresheet was their first attempt at meeting this goal. While the spacecraft did land, it first touched the surface about 1000 meters per second faster than intended. The mishap occurred late in the descent profile when the main engine failed – resulting in a very low-angle (<10 degrees), high-speed impact.

The Beresheet impact occurred on 11 April 2019 and LRO passed overhead 11 days later, allowing LROC to acquire a six-image (three NAC left-right pairs) sequence of the search area. The coordinates of the darkest pixel (lowest reflectance) of the central "smudge" are 32.5956 deg N, 19.3496 deg E, with a 20-m (latitude) by 8-m (longitude) 95% confidence interval, estimated from seven images acquired before the impact event (over the course of the LRO mission). The elevation is about 2613 meters, and although the uncertainty is not well constrained at this time, it is likely less than 10 meters.

Temporal ratio images enhance changes to the surface revealing subtle ejecta patterns. The point of impact is marked by a dark smudge about 10 meters across, where the surface reflectance was lowered by about 10 percent. At the scale of the NAC image we cannot detect a crater; perhaps there is one but it is simply too small to be seen, or the low angle of impact (less than ten degrees relative to the surface), the fragility of the spacecraft, and the velocity precluded crater formation (think gouge rather than crater). The smudge is likely a roughened surface (more micro-shadows) due to the impact and disintegration of the lander.

Above: Left: Beresheet crash site. Right: Ratio of after/before images enhancing subtle changes to brightness of the surface, scale bar is 100 meters, north is up, both panels are 490 meters wide.

Surrounding the smudge is an area of increased reflectance (up to 20 percent higher). This ragged zone spans 30 to 50 meters from the smudge and includes a ray that extends southward about 100 meters. The higher reflectance was likely caused by gases or very fine high-speed particles rapidly moving away from the impact site, which smoothed the upper layer of regolith and redistributed fine soil particles, which in turn increased reflectance.

While not a successful soft landing, the Beresheet impact provides another example of small impact events; the crash site can be compared to the two GRAIL and LADEE spacecraft that impacted the Moon in 2012 and 2014, respectively. The study of these impacts is giving us new insights into how the lunar regolith (soil) evolves over time.

Despite the mishap, it is important to remember that Beresheet was the first spacecraft developed and flown by a non-profit entity to orbit the Moon. And SpaceIL has announced they will be trying again, with Beresheet 2!

AstroCasey
Member

Posts: 58
From:
Registered: Feb 2019

posted 06-25-2019 06:07 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AstroCasey     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The second Beresheet will be going somewhere other than the Moon.
This time, we will not go to the moon. Beresheet's journey to the Moon was already received as a successful, record-breaking journey. Instead we will seek out another, significant objective for Beresheet 2.0. More details to follow...

ManInSpace
Member

Posts: 190
From: Brooklin, ON Canada
Registered: Feb 2018

posted 06-25-2019 09:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for ManInSpace     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Like many here, I followed and supported the earlier Israeli mission; but if your only landing attempt resulted in a crash you shouldn't be talking about the Moon not being "enough of challenge"!

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 45219
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 06-26-2019 11:45 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I too am disappointed with SpaceIL's decision. It is essentially their saying, "If at first you don't succeed, give up and try something else."

It makes me wonder if their assessment of their first mission or their available funding for the second has led them to believe that a moon mission at this scale is not possible and their statement is a means of saving face.

denali414
Member

Posts: 711
From: Raleigh, NC
Registered: Aug 2017

posted 06-27-2019 05:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for denali414   Click Here to Email denali414     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
With the Space Act of 2015 and Luxumbourg Space Act (which Israel has an office there), maybe Israel is just looking to "plant a flag" for future mining and commercial development. Probably cheaper and less competition if it went after an asteroid.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 45219
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 08-05-2019 06:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The Arch Mission Foundation payload on Beresheet included "thousands of tardigrades, those microscopic 'water bears' that can survive pretty much any environment — including space."
But when the Israelis confirmed Beresheet had been destroyed, [Arch Mission founder Nova] Spivack was faced with a distressing question: Did he just smear the toughest animal in the known universe across the surface of the moon?

In the weeks following the Beresheet crash, Spivack pulled together the Arch Mission Foundation’s advisors in an attempt to determine whether the lunar library had survived the crash. Based on their analysis of the spacecraft’s trajectory and the composition of the lunar library, Spivack says he is quite confident that the library — a roughly DVD-sized object made of thin sheets of nickel — survived the crash mostly or entirely intact. In fact, the decision to include DNA samples and tardigrades in the lunar library may have been key to its survival.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 45219
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 10-23-2019 01:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Speaking at the International Astronautical Congress (IAC), Ehud Hayun, a space systems engineer at the Israel Aerospace Industries, said that his country intends to re-attempt a mission to the moon, reports Space.com:
But despite the hard landing, Israel has no intent to stop chasing the moon, Hayun said. (Shortly after the crash, the SpaceIL organization behind the mission suggested it would target a different destination than the moon; it's unclear what will happen on that front.) The team behind Beresheet has mostly stayed on, he said during his presentation, and they intend to fly a new version of the lander within two or 2.5 years.

The successor spacecraft would include some design tweaks meant to increase the mission's odds of landing softly. New versions will carry upgraded computers and, unlike the original Beresheet spacecraft, will be armed with an obstacle-avoidance system for landing. But Israel's future landers will still be compact and still work with rideshare launches, Hayun said.

SpaceAholic
Member

Posts: 4720
From: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 12-07-2020 04:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SpaceAholic   Click Here to Email SpaceAholic     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
From SpaceIL on Twitter:
Ready to get excited again?

Back to the Moon. 9.12.20.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 45219
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 12-09-2020 08:36 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
From SpaceIL (via Twitter):
We are proud to announce that Beresheet 2 is going to head to the Moon in the first half of 2024! It will include two landers, each of which will carry out experiments on the surface of the Moon, and an orbiter that will stay for several years.

garymilgrom
Member

Posts: 2009
From: Atlanta, GA
Registered: Feb 2007

posted 12-09-2020 09:34 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for garymilgrom   Click Here to Email garymilgrom     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'm disappointed in the timing of this. According to Scott's post we were supposed to be excited by today's news posted by Robert. But 2024 is too far away.

In my opinion private spaceflight vendors are showing that these types of extended timetables are no longer acceptable. SpaceIL have all the knowledge and experience gained from building and operating the first Beresheet, let's step on the gas for no. 2.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 45219
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 12-09-2020 03:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
"Stepping on the gas" generally requires increased funding. SpaceIL is operating on a relatively tiny budget.

There is no prize for getting there sooner. The moon will be there when SpaceIL is ready. Better they get it right and see a successful landing (or two) on their next try.

SkyMan1958
Member

Posts: 953
From: CA.
Registered: Jan 2011

posted 12-09-2020 04:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for SkyMan1958   Click Here to Email SkyMan1958     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I second Robert's opinion. The first Beresheet lunar lander was a privately funded endeavor. I strongly suspect that Beresheet 2 has a fair amount of public money (as a percentage) involved.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement