Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Space Shuttles - Space Station
  STS-1: Orbital Maneuvering System (OMS) burns

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   STS-1: Orbital Maneuvering System (OMS) burns
Lunar Module 5
Member

Posts: 370
From: Wales, UK
Registered: Dec 2004

posted 04-26-2014 04:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lunar Module 5   Click Here to Email Lunar Module 5     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
According to the mission audio, STS-1's orbital maneuvering system (OMS)-3 burn was completed by using the right side OMS engine only.

Does anyone know if OMS4 was done with both or single OMS engines?

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 05-02-2014 02:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Courtesy Dennis Jenkins:
  • OMS-1 - Both - 87 seconds
  • OMS-2 - Both - 75 seconds
  • OMS-3 - Left - 29 seconds
  • OMS-4 - Right - 33 seconds
  • Deorbit - Both - 155 seconds

Lunar Module 5
Member

Posts: 370
From: Wales, UK
Registered: Dec 2004

posted 05-03-2014 01:15 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lunar Module 5   Click Here to Email Lunar Module 5     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks for the info Robert.

In the STS-1 audio, Crippen refers to OMS3 as using the right hand engine and that's confirmed by Capcom Hartsfield... perhaps they were looking at them the wrong way.

For the full mission video, because I didn't know any better, I showed the right engine firing for OMS3 and both for OMS4 - apologies to the purists.

Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42988
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 05-04-2014 10:39 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Dennis discovered the reason for the disparity between reports: the mission report was wrong.

The times are correct (depending on how one rounds to a full second) but the engines were reversed. He suspects this might have been because the OMS-3 and -4 burns were conducted as cross-feed tests where the opposite set of tanks fed the engine (so OMS-3 used propellant from the left tanks to feed the right engine).

This may have led to some confusion when whomever transcribed the verbal report to the written report. According to the mission events list (MEL) it was:

  • OMS-1 - Both - 87 seconds
  • OMS-2 - Both - 75 seconds
  • OMS-3 - Right - 29 seconds
  • OMS-4 - Left - 33 seconds
  • Deorbit - Both - 155 seconds

Lunar Module 5
Member

Posts: 370
From: Wales, UK
Registered: Dec 2004

posted 05-04-2014 04:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lunar Module 5   Click Here to Email Lunar Module 5     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks Robert - that makes more sense now.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement