Author
|
Topic: Mission specialists: designations and seats
|
eilisk Member Posts: 100 From: London Registered: Oct 2004
|
posted 01-05-2008 08:07 AM
Having spent my recent free time boosting my shuttle knowledge, I've got a question about the mission specialist (MS) designations.MS1/MS2 generally take a seat on the flight deck, and that one of them will be the designated flight engineer. My question is this - does the flight engineer role specifically mean that someone is assigned MS1 (or 2) and do they fulfill the flight engineer role both for ascent and descent? I know that one of the MS'es will swap with someone in mid-deck for descent sometimes and I was wondering if that was because the mid-deck MS had trained as the descent flight engineer. All the best Eilis |
Tom Member Posts: 1597 From: New York Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 01-05-2008 08:48 AM
MS-2 is usually the flight engineer, and that crew member usually has that position for both ascent and re-entry. However, there were a couple of flights where that crew member had that responsibility for only ascent or entry (ie: STS-5). |
Jay Chladek Member Posts: 2272 From: Bellevue, NE, USA Registered: Aug 2007
|
posted 01-05-2008 04:57 PM
Typically one MS is the flight engineer for both ascent and reentry and his/her seat is between the CDR and pilot. The second seat on the flight deck is typically swapped between two MSes, with one sitting there for ascent and the other for reentry.The person in the right most seat on the flight deck does indeed train as a flight engineer of sorts, although given his seat position, I don't think he has a long stick that the main flight engineer has, which allows him to throw switches that are too far back behind the pilots to effectively use. But, this MS does follow along with the check list and branches off with the pilot for troubleshooting purposes on the checklists while the prime flight engineer splits off and does the same thing with the CDR. |
eilisk Member Posts: 100 From: London Registered: Oct 2004
|
posted 01-08-2008 03:17 AM
Hi allThanks for the info so far. What was the difference with STS-5 having the F.Eng role split out? Was it the landing at Edwards? Have any other missions also had the Flight Engineer role split between ascent and re-entry? All the best Eilis |
kimmern123 Member Posts: 83 From: Norway Registered: Dec 2006
|
posted 01-08-2008 05:41 AM
It was due to the fact that the ejection seats were still installed on the flight deck. Because of that only one more seat could be squeezed in on the flight deck leaving one of the crewmembers on the flight deck. I guess they switched out so both of them could get a shot on the flight deck. It had nothing to do with landing at Edwards. |
OV-105 Member Posts: 816 From: Ridgecrest, CA Registered: Sep 2000
|
posted 01-09-2008 09:29 PM
I think STS-9 still only had three on the flight deck and then a MS and the two PS's on the mid deck. They didn't get the ejection seats out tell it Columbia went back to Palmdale in 1984. |