Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Mercury - Gemini - Apollo
  Protecting Hasselblad cameras on the Moon

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Protecting Hasselblad cameras on the Moon
Apolloman
Member

Posts: 152
From: Ledignan, Gard (30), France
Registered: Mar 2009

posted 12-10-2010 11:47 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Apolloman   Click Here to Email Apolloman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I would like to know what was the protection of Hasselblad used on the lunar surface... on documents found indicate that it is:
The Data Camera was given a silver finish to make it more resistant to thermal variations that ranged from full Sun to full shadow helping maintain a more uniform internal temperature.
Okay, but what is its reflection coefficient? Would you have records showing the manufacture of equipment and modifications?

Apolloman
Member

Posts: 152
From: Ledignan, Gard (30), France
Registered: Mar 2009

posted 12-10-2010 04:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Apolloman   Click Here to Email Apolloman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I finally find. We must look towards the emissivity of materials. The text NASA says "a silver finish."

I looked up the rate of emissivity of polished silver. I found a rate of 0.02 / 0.003, assuredly a pretty good protection.

dsenechal
Member

Posts: 548
From:
Registered: Dec 2002

posted 12-10-2010 09:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for dsenechal   Click Here to Email dsenechal     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The finish on the Hasselblad EDC was not polished silver. It was silver paint, sprayed over the original anodized black finish of the camera. Nothing too exotic, but obviously did the job.

Apolloman
Member

Posts: 152
From: Ledignan, Gard (30), France
Registered: Mar 2009

posted 12-11-2010 04:53 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Apolloman   Click Here to Email Apolloman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Would you have sources on what you advance?

Rick Mulheirn
Member

Posts: 4208
From: England
Registered: Feb 2001

posted 12-12-2010 05:16 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Rick Mulheirn   Click Here to Email Rick Mulheirn     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It is my understanding that changes were made to lubricants used in the camera mechanism to minimise the risk of out gassing in the vacuum of space.

KA9Q
New Member

Posts: 3
From: San Diego, CA
Registered: Mar 2012

posted 07-15-2012 09:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for KA9Q   Click Here to Email KA9Q     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
There are *two* critical parameters that determine a surface's thermal properties: absorptance (alpha) and emittance (epsilon). Alpha is a measure of how visually dark it is, how much visible and near IR light it absorbs from the sun. Emittance is a measure of how "dark" the surface would appear if you could see in the far IR around 10 microns where objects near room temperature emit their thermal radiation.

Leave an object in the sun and it will reach an equilibrium temperature where it radiates as much heat as it absorbs. The temperature at which it does this depends strongly on the ratio of alpha to epsilon; lower ratios mean colder, higher ratios mean hotter.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement