|
Author
|
Topic: Apollo 8 signed Earthrise: 8x10 vs. 16x20
|
Sam
Member Posts: 68
From: South Africa
Registered: Jun 2014
|
posted 12-05-2015 01:15 AM
   
I've decided to purchase an Apollo 8 earthrise photograph that is signed by Lovell and Borman from Novaspace. However I'm not sure whether to purchase an 8x10 or a 16x20? Does the quality of the picture deteriorate if it's a 16x20? |
SkyMan1958
Member Posts: 867
From: CA.
Registered: Jan 2011
|
posted 12-05-2015 02:00 AM
As of in many things, that depends. If the producer of the image just blew up the standard image, then yes the image would not look as sharp in the larger format. However, if the producer of the image resampled the pixels in the smaller image then a blown up picture would look just as detailed as the smaller image. |
mode1charlie
Member Posts: 1169
From: Honolulu, HI
Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted 12-05-2015 02:02 AM
I have one of the same signed print from Novaspace at 16x20, and so while I can't compare it to the smaller size, it looks great and you won't be disappointed. |
Daugherty54
Member Posts: 591
From: Cabot, Arkansas, USA
Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted 12-05-2015 08:26 PM
I also have the 16x20 and I am very happy with the resolution and the overall quality of the picture. I would recommend it. |
Jeff
Member Posts: 474
From: Fayetteville, NC, USA
Registered: May 2009
|
posted 12-06-2015 07:39 AM
I completely agree with the two previous posts. I also have a 16x20 Earthrise and couldn't be happier with the resolution and quality of the photo along with the top notch archival framing from Novaspace/Astronaut Central, I also recommend it. |
advertisement