Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

  collectSPACE: Messages
  Space Events & Happenings
  Houston Chronicle questions public confidence in space program and NASA's response

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Houston Chronicle questions public confidence in space program and NASA's response
Robert Pearlman
Editor

Posts: 42986
From: Houston, TX
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 08-26-2007 09:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Robert Pearlman   Click Here to Email Robert Pearlman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
On Sunday, the Houston Chronicle published an editorial titled, Falling objects: NASA's rash of problems threatens to erode public confidence in the space program. The column listed headline-grabbing stories from the past year that, for the most part, had a tenuous connection to NASA (either by setting or employment) or in one case, had nothing to do with the space agency at all (the tragic loss of life during a Scaled Composites engine test).

The Chronicle's editors concluded that unless NASA finds a way to put a stop to these type of stories (and the activities they describe), "public support for bold expeditions to the moon and Mars will fade."

Later on Sunday, Johnson Space Center director and former astronaut Mike Coats sent a response to the column to all employees at the Houston space center. It is reprinted here in its entirety:

quote:
The Sunday Houston Chronicle contained an editorial highly critical of NASA. The editorial had a number of inaccuracies and misleading statements. I sent the following response to the Houston Chronicle today, in hopes that it will be printed in tomorrow's edition. I wanted you to see the full text sent to the Chronicle.

Mike

--------

Sunday's Houston Chronicle (Falling Objects) presented an unbalanced and biased portrayal of NASA and the thousands of people working in our space program whose technological achievements have been a major contributor to the robust economy we enjoy and largely take for granted. I must take this opportunity to correct the misleading and inaccurate information portrayed as fact:

The rocket engine explosion that killed two people in California involved a private company unrelated to NASA operating at a facility miles away from the Edwards Air Force Base. The "facts" in the editorial are completely in error.

To the events of the past year outlined in the editorial, I can honestly say NASA has made great strides in improving its financial accountability and we take pride in being good stewards of the taxpayers' money. To list one incident of lost computer equipment, and then refer to general "financial irresponsibility" is unfair and sensational.

The Space Shuttle is an amazing vehicle, and we will not see another vehicle like it for many generations. We are still in our first half century of human spaceflight experience, and learn more about operating in space with each mission we fly. To say that we have "failed to solve a problem . that makes every flight a disaster waiting to happen" is not only inaccurate but misleading. In 119 Shuttle missions, we have incorporated improvements and developed techniques to improve safety. On August 21 on the runway in Florida, we got our first look at the damaged tile on Endeavour. It looked exactly as we expected based on aero-thermal, structures and computational fluid dynamics models and tests conducted during the flight indicated it would. Endeavour returned home safely because of engineering expertise, not luck.

To characterize a tragic murder/suicide and Lisa Nowak's aberrant behavior as "lurid" is irresponsible. That tragedy was a first on any NASA facility in its 50 year history. The Nowak case is sad for all of us, but the same external review committee report referenced by the Chronicle confirmed it is highly unlikely her "act of passion" could have been predicted or prevented. Astronauts are human, with human frailties. Lisa is being held accountable for her actions, but it should not be forgotten that she had an exemplary career and her service to the country as a Naval Aviator, test pilot, and astronaut was simply outstanding.

To condemn astronauts based on limited and uncorroborated comments in a report is inflammatory and unfair. The report chairman himself stated that "we cannot say with any certainty whether they, in fact, were at all under the influence or affected at the time that they actually flew." Internal and congressional investigations are on-going, and I hope when the facts are known, the Chronicle will show the same enthusiasm for the story. Astronauts take great pride in this country and the people who make it possible to fly in space, and would never jeopardize a mission by drinking inappropriately.

NASA's flight surgeons are the finest group of medical professionals I have ever encountered. It is an insult to infer they would ever become indifferent to the health needs of the astronauts, or anyone under their care.

NASA is not perfect. We have and will make mistakes and we will take responsibility for them. The Chronicle editorial was grossly unfair to the thousands of space professionals who enable this country to lead the world in technology and exploration.

Michael L. Coats

Director, Johnson Space Center


AstronautBrian
Member

Posts: 287
From: Louisiana
Registered: Jan 2006

posted 08-27-2007 12:20 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for AstronautBrian   Click Here to Email AstronautBrian     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The media in general does not help the situation at all. They have a talent for trivializig the momentous and complicating the obvious when it comes to spaceflight.

Present company excluded, of course. :-)

------------------
"There's a meaning there, but the meaning there doesn't really mean a thing." - Russell Morris

cspg
Member

Posts: 6210
From: Geneva, Switzerland
Registered: May 2006

posted 08-27-2007 12:30 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for cspg   Click Here to Email cspg     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
In the same vein as the Houston Chronicle's article, here's another one: http://www.lacitybeat.com/article.php?id=6049&IssueNum=220

Regarding the Houston Chronicle editorial:
The Chronicle's editors concluded that unless NASA finds a way to put a stop to these type of stories (and the activities they describe), "public support for bold expeditions to the moon and Mars will fade."

Are there polls that indicate a support for Moon/Mars missions? Hard to tell from this side of the Atlantic. I think that there may be in theory but when presented with the budgets required, support might vanish. Or am I wrong?

Chris.

Lou Chinal
Member

Posts: 1306
From: Staten Island, NY
Registered: Jun 2007

posted 08-27-2007 01:57 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lou Chinal   Click Here to Email Lou Chinal     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The words "Fact" and "Allegation" are often used interchangeably - it depends on who's telling the story.

tncmaxq
Member

Posts: 287
From: New Haven, CT USA
Registered: Oct 2001

posted 08-27-2007 07:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for tncmaxq   Click Here to Email tncmaxq     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That error linking the Scaled Composites accident to NASA is not only bad journalism it is just downright dumb. Presumably the paper has been notified about this and will have to print a correction. At least they should.

This sort of thing is not that uncommon. There have been cases in the past where Air Force launches failed and the media reported on a blow to "the space program." I can understand if the general public thinks all rockets are NASA-related but when supposedly trained journalists make these mistakes, or fail to do proper research, then it's an outrage.

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a





advertisement