|
|
Author
|
Topic: NASA Budget released
|
DavidH Member Posts: 1217 From: Huntsville, AL, USA Registered: Jun 2003
|
posted 02-08-2005 01:03 PM
Though a smaller increase than initially indicated, the president's FY06 budget request does include additional funding for NASA.CEV is kept on track for 2008 fly-off, but cuts in several areas. http://www1.nasa.gov/about/budget/index.html ------------------ http://allthese worlds.hatbag.net/space.php "America's challenge of today has forged man's destiny of tomorrow." - Commander Eugene Cernan, Apollo 17 Mission, 11 December 1972 |
Philip Member Posts: 5952 From: Brussels, Belgium Registered: Jan 2001
|
posted 02-08-2005 02:50 PM
Whatever the budget, it's NOT enough to save the Hubble Space Telescope ... I really hope the Europeans will get first to Mars ... then the US might reconsider ;-) |
mdaymont Member Posts: 39 From: Pleasant Grove, Utah,USA Registered: May 2003
|
posted 02-08-2005 05:02 PM
Saving the Hubble won't get us any closer to Mars.The fact is, Hubble will cost a lot of $ to maintain and repair. We now have ground telescopes that are matching much of Hubble's capabillities. We also have the Next Generation space telescope under development. No need to be duplicating effort with the resultant costs. Push on with new projects. The ESA won't get people to Mars without a complete change in thinking and funding. Not likely.Best regards, Mark in Utah | |
Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts
Copyright 2020 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a
|
|
|
advertisement
|