Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

Websites
related space history websites

Forum:Commercial Space - Military Space
Topic:[Discuss] Sierra Nevada Corp.'s Dream Chaser
Want to register?
Who Can Post? Any registered users may post a reply.
About Registration You must be registered in order to post a topic or reply in this forum.
Your UserName:
Your Password:   Forget your password?
Your Reply:


*HTML is ON
*UBB Code is ON

Smilies Legend

Options Disable Smilies in This Post.
Show Signature: include your profile signature. Only registered users may have signatures.
*If HTML and/or UBB Code are enabled, this means you can use HTML and/or UBB Code in your message.

If you have previously registered, but forgotten your password, click here.

Jay ChladekAll things considered, I was probably pulling for SNC the most, given that they are going with a design that probably has the highest risk, yet the capability for the highest reward in fast turnaround with it being potentially fully reuseable and capable of land landings on a runway. I just wish they could potentially have gotten more funding compared to the other two contractors.

If they are less than a year away from approach and landing tests, do they plan to conduct those with a manned vehicle, or will it be an RPV version of the craft?

Robert PearlmanAccording to the information released by NASA today, the only milestone under SNC's CCiCap award that involves flight testing uses an engineering test article.
Robert PearlmanSpace.com reports that the Dream Chaser is slated to fly on its own for the first time in the next six to eight weeks, a key drop-test milestone in the vehicle's quest to fly astronauts on roundtrip space missions.
The Dream Chaser spacecraft, built by aerospace firm Sierra Nevada Corp., will be released by a carrier helicopter at an altitude of 12,000 feet (3,657 meters) or so, then fly back and land autonomously on a runway at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center in California.

The unmanned 30-second drop test will kick off a series of trials that culminate in trips to low-Earth orbit and back, potentially paving the way for contracted, crew-carrying flights to the International Space Station for NASA, company officials said during a press conference today (Jan. 30).

Lou Chinal
quote:
Originally posted by Jay Chladek:
All things considered, I was probably pulling for SNC the most...
I have to agree with you Jay.

I've done some calculations and have concluded that a small solid rocket could lift "Dream Chaser" high enough and with enough speed to make an approach to a runway. Assuming there is a runway next the launch pad. You would have to establish winds at launch for energy management.

Now the question is would you want to reenter with that engine?

Jay ChladekA solid motor for aborts likely won't be needed since the Dreamchaser will have a pair of OMS type motors onboard. Plus, the abort modes for the craft won't be as potentially nasty for the bird on an Atlas V rocket according to a couple of the Dreamchaser guys I talked with at STS-135 in 2011. Reason being, the Atlas being a liquid rocket can be shut down during an abort so the rockets needed to get the craft free don't require as much thrust. With the Orion Ares 1 stack (and indeed with SLS) with solids under thrust, the ATK designed LAS system needs to be as powerful as it is the get the capsule far away from a potentially out of control solid ASAP (or at least far enough away from the solid for range safety to detonate it).

How the Dreamchaser would fare during recovery I would say is going to depend on its ditching characteristics. Shuttle was NOT a good craft to ditch in (thank goodness nobody ever had to put that to the test in real life), but the Dreamchaser being a lighter vehicle (although one with still a rather high wing loading) might do better. Still, a runway landing would be a much better prospect for the crew to survive such a worst case scenario.

Lou ChinalCongress may insist on such a safety factor.
Jay Chladek
quote:
Originally posted by Lou Chinal:
Congress may insist on such a safety factor.

I doubt Congress will have much say in the matter either way. Sure, they might dictate to NASA to ensure that the commercial services contractor has done as much as possible with a specific configuration for safety. But NASA would still have to make the final determination and with NASA, it will likely come down to running the numbers and statistical analysis to determine if such an abort motor system for Dreamchaser would indeed be an asset or a liability.

Dreamchaser will have its own onboard OMS motors and they will likely provide more thrust than what the shuttle's did (because shuttle was a much heavier craft). Man rating the Atlas V might also involve setting up the upper stage for use as an abort motor as well (but I am just guessing there).

Lou ChinalAfter everything is said and done, Congress is going to have put up the money.
daboltonLove the fuzzy dice in the Dream Chaser engineering test article's cockpit.

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts

Copyright 1999-2012 collectSPACE.com All rights reserved.


Ultimate Bulletin Board Version 5.47a





advertisement