collectSPACE: Messages - Edit this post

Space News
space history and artifacts articles

Messages
space history discussion forums

Sightings
worldwide astronaut appearances

Resources
selected space history documents

Forum: Mercury - Gemini - Apollo
Topic: Saturn V rocket fins: show vs. stablization

Only forum leaders (Administrator, Editor) or the person that posted this message may edit this message (and only registered users may edit/delete posts) Note: Only forum leaders may delete posts.
Delete? To delete this post, check this box.
Your UserName:
Your Password:	Forget your password?
Message to Edit: HTML is ON UBB Code is ON Smilies Legend	Originally posted by Ken Havekotte on 04-07-2006 09:46 PM von Braun said, simply put, that fins on rockets serve the same purpose as an arrow's tail feathers. They provide aerodynamic stability during flight through the atmosphere by pulling the so-called Center of Pressure (CP) behind the Center of Gravity (CG). Many rockets today don't have fins, however, for manned spaceflight — in most cases fins had a definite advantage. Von Braun goes on to explain: <BLOCKQUOTE>[i]Since the flight path, usually into orbit, is predetermined, and thus ideally suited to programed changes in gain setting, it might appear that there should be no need for fins. The problem of manned spaceflight, however, lies in the area of emergency provisions... or more specifically, abort procedures. Suppose a large launch vehicle such as Saturn V has a serious autopilot failure at the most critical part of its ascent through the atmosphere — the high-stagnation-pressure period when the speeding rocket bucks the most severe aerodynamic forces. A failure in a swivel actuator may throw one of the five F-1 booster engines into a hard-over deflection, while an additional electrical failure may prevent the other engines from counteracting the unwanted turning motion. In such a case, if high inherent aerodynamic instability assisted in rapidly increasing the angle of attack, structural overload might break up the rocket before the astronauts in the Apollo Command Module, triggering their escape rocket, could put a safe distance between themselves and the ensuing fireball in the sky.[/i]</BLOCKQUOTE> Dr. von Braun goes on to explain: <BLOCKQUOTE>[i]It is in this area of crew safety that fins come in handy. In Saturn IB and V the booster fins are not used to provide perfect aerodynamic stability under all conditions — that would take fins of excessive size. But the fins reduce the aerodynamic instability enough to make sure that the astronauts can safely abort, no matter what technical trouble may afflict their space vehicle. Our aim is to reduce the "turning rate, the rotational speed at which the aerodynamically unstable Saturn, when stricken by an autopilot failure, would turn into an angle of attack at which its structure would be bound to fail.[/i]</BLOCKQUOTE> In conclusion, in order to sum this up, one might say the purpose of the fins is to extend — on some older and still-current manned vehicles — the period of grace that the crew member(s) have to get away from an impending explosion caused by structural failure.
	Disable Smilies in This Post.
*If HTML and/or UBB Code are enabled, this means you can use HTML and/or UBB Code in your message.

Contact Us | The Source for Space History & Artifacts